In 2006, Peoples Bank sponsored a new South Shore poster in
conjunction with the Northwest Indiana Forum, Inc. and the
South Shore Arts organization. With Access for All, by Fred Semmler,
depicts U.S. Congressman Peter Viscloskys Marquette Plan.
The poster was unveiled on September 1, 2006 at Peoples Banks
Corporate Center in Munster. Posters are available for purchase
at the Visual & Performing Arts Center in Munster. |
2006 Annual Report
Dear Shareholders,
The Bancorp reported another solid performance for the year 2006 with net income of $6.5 million.
Statistically our performance was very strong: our return on assets (ROA), which measures net
income as a percentage of average assets, was 1.04% and our return on equity (ROE), which measures
the return on invested capital, was 13.42%. Our capital, or shareholders equity, finished the year
at $50 million or 8.1% of total assets.
The year 2006 proved to be a challenging year for the entire banking industry, as well as your
Bank. The increase in short-term rates, the persistent inverted yield curve and continued
consolidation through mergers has made it difficult for many to sustain prior year earnings
results. Although 2006 was a good year, our results were not as robust as reports from prior
periods. 2006 marked the first time in ten years that the Bancorp reported a decline in income from
the previous year.
Over the past two years, the Federal Reserve has taken action to raise interest rates in an effort
to fight inflationary trends in the national economy. The result has been good news for our deposit
customers because interest rates paid on deposits have risen substantially. At the same time,
yields on the Bancorps earning assets, loans and investments, have not risen as dramatically.
The Federal Reserves policy to raise short-term interest rates in the current operating
environment has resulted in an inverted yield curve, a term that describes short-term interest
rates having yields higher than long-term rates. Under such conditions, the increase in yields on
loans and investments generally lag the increases in rates paid to depositors as well as the rates
the Bancorp pays on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings.
During 2006, loan and investment yields lagged the higher rates paid to depositors resulting in a
negative impact on the Bancorps core earnings. Net interest income, the difference between
interest received from loans and investments and interest paid to fund providers, totaled $19.2
million for 2006 compared to $20.3 million for 2005, a decrease of 5.1%. The compression of our net
interest margin, which began during 2005, accelerated throughout the current year with funding
pressure continuing to be exerted through the fourth quarter of 2006.
1
Market forces worked to contain asset growth during the year. Management determined that the
persistence of the high short-term rate environment was not conducive to smart growth. Offering
excessive deposit rates could have attained market share, but not market value. Such a strategy
could not be executed in an environment that did not offer matching high rate and high quality
loans and investments.
Throughout the year, our balance sheet was actively managed to sustain long-term market value
rather than short-term market share. At December 31, 2006, our assets totaled $619 million, a
decrease of 1.3% for the year. Deposits totaled $513 million, a decrease of $12.8 million from the
end of 2005. The decrease in deposits can be attributed to market forces as well as a planned
withdrawal by a local government unit.
Consolidation of the local community banks in 2005 reverberated into 2006 with implications on
the Bancorps lending portfolio. Loan participations that the Bancorp had acquired from two former
community banks were repurchased by the successors of those financial institutions resulting in
decreases in the Bancorps loan portfolio that exceeded $20 million. As a result, the Bancorps
lending portfolio totaled $471.7 million, an increase of $2.7 million.
Despite the strains on the core earnings of the Bancorp in 2006, there were notable successes in
our performance that offer a sturdy base for long-term earnings growth.
|
n |
|
Core deposits, which include checking, savings, and money market accounts totaled
$299.6 million or 58.4% of all deposits at year-end |
|
|
n |
|
Investment Securities totaled $99.0 million, an increase of $8.9 million |
|
|
n |
|
Asset quality remains strong with non-performing loans to total assets at the
manageable level of 0.50% at the end of the year |
|
|
n |
|
Operating expenses were held to a 3.8% increase during the year |
|
|
n |
|
Income from banking operations, including Wealth Management, totaled $4.2 million,
an increase of 19.2% |
|
|
n |
|
$9.2 million of long-term fixed rate loans originated during the year were sold to
minimize interest rate risk at a gain of $157 thousand |
|
|
n |
|
Home Equity Loans, a key part of our strategy to add interest sensitive
loans to our portfolio, grew $2.2 million or 14.6% |
As the Bancorp builds long-term shareholder value, we will continue to seek new opportunities to
expand our commitment to deliver the best banking, lending, and wealth management experience to our
customers and community. In the near term, the Bancorp will work harder to produce earning assets
that can adjust more rapidly to an increase in
interest rates. We are committed to achieving our growth goals while improving our balance sheet
with interest sensitive loans and investments funded
by core accounts.
2
Customer preferences have changed the competitiveness of banking while providing new opportunities
to serve our customers. The coming retirement of the baby boomer generation, along with the
conversion of bank customers from depositors to investors, is re-shaping the financial landscape.
In the latter part of 2006, Terry Quinn, a well-respected financial advisor, joined the Peoples
team as a Senior Vice-President of Wealth Management and has become an integral part of our effort
to deliver a wide range of investment vehicles to our customers. Our goal to offer a full array of
financial products will enable the Bancorp to become a partner in our customers prosperity.
Bank consolidation has brought a number of new banking companies to our trade territory with new
forms of competition. As a community Bank, we have the advantage of not only knowing our customers,
but also being able to meet directly with them and tailor a response to their banking needs. This
year we will expand our offices to include a new Banking Center in Crown Point and we continue to
seek other locations that will profitably build value for the Bancorp.
Your Bank continues to take an active role in the community. We provided support to over 225
community organizations in 2006. Notable among them was our success again this year with our
Holiday Project. The Peoples team directors and employees contributed $8,550 to the project, an
amount that was matched by your company. These funds were distributed between Habitat for Humanity
to support affordable housing and the Boys and Girls Club of Northwest Indiana to provide clothing
essentials for worthy youth in our community. Since its inception in 1994, our Holiday Project has
contributed over $121,000 to these two community organizations.
In both the near and long-term, our value as a community bank will be determined by the markets
response to our brand. Friendly People for Todays Banking describes a financially educated,
motivated, and well-trained team that is committed to building trust, excellence, and exceptional
customer service. Our goal for 2007 is to put in place a training and marketing plan that will give
new definition and new energy to Friendly People for Todays Banking.
On behalf of the Bancorps directors and employees, thank you for your support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Bochnowski |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
3
Financial Highlights
$5,493
$5,936
$6,290
$6,672 $6,475
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Net Income
in thousands
$2,968
$3,312
$3,540
$
Noninterest Income
in thousands
$17,674
$18,836
$19,756 $20,266
$19,241
Net Interest Income
in thousands
$488.0 $508.8
$557.4
$627.4 $619.0
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Total Assets
in millions
$380.4
$409.8
$433.8
$469.0 $471.7
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Total Loans
in millions
$406.7 $421.6
$451.6
$525.7 $
2005 2004 2003 2002
Total Deposits
in millions |
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1.18% 1.20% 1.17% 1.14%
1.04%
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Return on Assets
14.58% 14.65% 14.64% 14.67%
13.42%
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Return on Equity
53.4% 55.2% 57.1% 57.9%
60.9%
2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
Efficiency Ratio |
5
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
in thousands of dollars, except per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
Statement of Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
34,979 |
|
|
$ |
30,024 |
|
|
$ |
26,614 |
|
|
$ |
26,357 |
|
|
$ |
27,781 |
|
|
$ |
28,425 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
15,737 |
|
|
|
9,758 |
|
|
|
6,858 |
|
|
|
7,521 |
|
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
19,241 |
|
|
|
20,266 |
|
|
|
19,756 |
|
|
|
18,836 |
|
|
|
17,674 |
|
|
|
15,203 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
19,226 |
|
|
|
20,021 |
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
18,416 |
|
|
|
16,954 |
|
|
|
14,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
4,219 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
14,296 |
|
|
|
13,771 |
|
|
|
13,174 |
|
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
10,859 |
|
|
|
9,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noninterest expense |
|
|
10,077 |
|
|
|
10,231 |
|
|
|
9,862 |
|
|
|
9,069 |
|
|
|
8,184 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expenses |
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
|
$ |
6,672 |
|
|
$ |
6,290 |
|
|
$ |
5,936 |
|
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
|
$ |
4,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
per common share |
|
$ |
2.32 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
Diluted earnings
per common share |
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Cash dividends declared
per common share |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
618,982 |
|
|
$ |
627,439 |
|
|
$ |
557,393 |
|
|
$ |
508,775 |
|
|
$ |
488,002 |
|
|
$ |
440,710 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
471,716 |
|
|
|
469,043 |
|
|
|
433,790 |
|
|
|
409,808 |
|
|
|
380,428 |
|
|
|
342,642 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
99,012 |
|
|
|
90,093 |
|
|
|
79,979 |
|
|
|
63,733 |
|
|
|
56,571 |
|
|
|
67,260 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
512,931 |
|
|
|
525,731 |
|
|
|
451,573 |
|
|
|
421,640 |
|
|
|
406,673 |
|
|
|
355,215 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
51,501 |
|
|
|
51,152 |
|
|
|
57,201 |
|
|
|
40,895 |
|
|
|
36,065 |
|
|
|
44,989 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
50,010 |
|
|
|
46,433 |
|
|
|
44,097 |
|
|
|
41,554 |
|
|
|
39,148 |
|
|
|
35,882 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
Interest Rate Spread During Period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average effective yield on loans
and investment securities |
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
7.29 |
% |
Average effective cost of deposits
and borrowings |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.40 |
% |
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
3.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
3.88 |
% |
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
3.31 |
% |
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
4.04 |
% |
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
3.90 |
% |
Return on average assets |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.18 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
Return on average equity |
|
|
13.42 |
% |
|
|
14.67 |
% |
|
|
14.64 |
% |
|
|
14.65 |
% |
|
|
14.58 |
% |
|
|
13.49 |
% |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
Total capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to adjusted
average assets |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
Allowance for loan losses to
total loans |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans |
|
|
153.95 |
% |
|
|
198.00 |
% |
|
|
371.00 |
% |
|
|
220.31 |
% |
|
|
152.43 |
% |
|
|
108.64 |
% |
Non-performing loans to
total loans |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
Total loan accounts |
|
|
5,392 |
|
|
|
5,422 |
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
5,213 |
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
4,964 |
|
Total deposit accounts |
|
|
32,435 |
|
|
|
33,963 |
|
|
|
32,866 |
|
|
|
32,502 |
|
|
|
31,385 |
|
|
|
30,433 |
|
Total Banking Centers
(all full service) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
$ |
28,077 |
|
|
$ |
25,607 |
|
|
$ |
25,235 |
|
|
$ |
23,669 |
|
|
|
|
13,386 |
|
|
|
11,281 |
|
|
|
12,310 |
|
|
|
11,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,691 |
|
|
|
14,326 |
|
|
|
12,925 |
|
|
|
11,948 |
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,516 |
|
|
|
14,126 |
|
|
|
12,815 |
|
|
|
11,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
9,449 |
|
|
|
8,774 |
|
|
|
7,938 |
|
|
|
7,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,454 |
|
|
|
7,115 |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
|
|
6,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
2,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,371 |
|
|
$ |
4,236 |
|
|
$ |
3,763 |
|
|
$ |
3,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
1999 |
| |
1998 |
| |
1997 |
|
|
|
$ |
392,313 |
|
|
$ |
361,719 |
|
|
$ |
345,417 |
|
|
$ |
319,609 |
|
|
|
|
326,207 |
|
|
|
295,813 |
|
|
|
273,433 |
|
|
|
272,213 |
|
|
|
|
38,128 |
|
|
|
41,931 |
|
|
|
36,350 |
|
|
|
29,362 |
|
|
|
|
324,310 |
|
|
|
306,647 |
|
|
|
293,222 |
|
|
|
272,090 |
|
|
|
|
30,599 |
|
|
|
18,607 |
|
|
|
17,320 |
|
|
|
14,628 |
|
|
|
|
33,529 |
|
|
|
32,471 |
|
|
|
31,316 |
|
|
|
29,482 |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
1999 |
| |
1998 |
| |
1997 |
|
|
|
|
7.88 |
% |
|
|
7.61 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
8.16 |
% |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
4.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
4.12 |
% |
|
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
|
13.30 |
% |
|
|
13.17 |
% |
|
|
12.35 |
% |
|
|
11.87 |
% |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
1999 |
| |
1998 |
| |
1997 |
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183.54 |
% |
|
|
412.08 |
% |
|
|
213.06 |
% |
|
|
257.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
0.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,762 |
|
|
|
4,676 |
|
|
|
4,625 |
|
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
|
|
28,906 |
|
|
|
27,712 |
|
|
|
26,172 |
|
|
|
25,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Business
NorthWest Indiana Bancorp (the Bancorp) is a
bank holding company registered with the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Peoples
Bank SB (the Bank), an Indiana savings bank, is a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Bancorp. The Bancorp
has no other business activity other than being the
holding company for Peoples Bank SB.
The Bancorp conducts business from its Corporate
Center in Munster and its eight full-service offices
located in East Chicago, Hammond, Merrillville, Dyer,
Munster, Schererville and Hobart, Indiana. The
Bancorp is primarily engaged in the business of
attracting deposits from the general public and the
origination of loans secured by single family
residences and commercial real estate, as well as,
construction loans, various types of consumer loans
and commercial business loans. In addition, the
Bancorps Wealth Management Group provides estate and
retirement planning, guardianships, land trusts,
profit sharing and 401(k) retirement plans, IRA and
Keogh accounts, investment agency accounts. The
Wealth Management Group may also serve as the
personal representative of estates and act as trustee
for revocable and irrevocable trusts.
The Bancorps common stock is traded in the
over-the-counter market and is quoted on the OTC
Bulletin Board. On February 23, 2007, the Bancorp
had 2,801,265 shares of common stock outstanding and
409 stockholders of record. This does not reflect
the number of persons or entities who may hold their
stock in nominee or street name through brokerage
firms.
7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
The Bancorps earnings are dependent upon the
earnings of the Bank. The Banks earnings are
primarily dependent upon net interest margin. The net
interest margin is the difference between interest
income earned on loans and investments and interest
expense paid on deposits and borrowings stated as a
percentage of average interest earning assets. The
net interest margin is perhaps the clearest indicator
of a financial institutions ability to generate core
earnings. Fees and service charges, wealth management
operations income, gains and losses from the sale of
assets, provisions for loan losses, income taxes and
operating expenses also affect the Bancorps
profitability.
A summary of our significant accounting policies
is detailed in Note 1 to the Bancorps consolidated
financial statements included in this report. The
preparation of our financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect our financial condition and operating results.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Estimates associated with the allowance for loan
losses, fair values of financial instruments and
status of contingencies are particularly susceptible
to material change in the near term as further
information becomes available and future events
occur.
At December 31, 2006, the Bancorp had total
assets of $619.0 million and total deposits of $512.9
million. The Bancorps deposit accounts are insured
up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund
(DIF) that is administered by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), an agency of the
federal government. At December 31, 2006, stockholders equity
totaled $50.0 million, with book value per share at
$17.86. Net income for 2006 was $6.5 million, or
$2.32 basic earnings per common share and $2.30
diluted earnings per common share. The return on
average assets (ROA) was 1.04%, while the return on
average stockholders equity (ROE) was 13.42%.
Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk
Asset/liability management involves the funding
and investment strategies necessary to maintain an
appropriate balance between interest sensitive assets
and liabilities as well as to assure adequate
liquidity. These strategies determine the
characteristics and mix of the balance sheet. They affect the interest margins, maturity
patterns, interest rate sensitivity and risk, as well
as resource allocation. For the Bancorp, the key
components of asset/liability management are loans,
investments, deposits and borrowed funds. Over the
years, the Bancorp has directed its lending efforts
toward construction and land development loans,
adjustable rate residential loans, equity lines of
credit, adjustable rate commercial real estate loans,
commercial business loans tied to the prime rate of
interest and loans to local governmental agencies.
Consumer loans are generally made for terms of five
years or less. Fixed rate residential real estate
loans are generally made for contractual terms of
thirty years or less. The actual cash flows from
these loans generally result in a duration which is
less than the contractual maturity, providing
protection against possible changes in interest
rates.
The Bancorp is primarily a portfolio lender.
Mortgage banking activities are generally limited to
the sale of fixed rate mortgage loans with
contractual maturities exceeding fifteen years. These
loans are identified as held for sale when originated
and sold, on a case-by-case basis, in the secondary
market as part of the Bancorps efforts to manage
interest rate risk.
The primary objectives of the investment
portfolio are to provide liquidity, modify and manage
interest rate risk, meet pledging requirements, and
optimize portfolio earnings by implementing
strategies that are consistent with the Bancorps
strategic goals. The investment portfolio includes
securities, an overnight open time account at the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, and federal
funds sold. Management of the investment portfolio
focuses on a laddered approach to portfolio
management. Daily funds are invested in either
federal funds or in the Bancorps overnight open time
account. Investments in non-callable and callable
securities are made with maturities ranging from one
day to seven years. Investments in callable
securities will generally focus on bonds with one
time calls and at least one year of call protection.
In addition, purchases of municipal securities,
mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized
mortgage obligations are made to reduce the Banks
tax liability, enhance portfolio yield, and increase
monthly cash flows. Securities are classified as
either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale.
Held-to-maturity securities are those that the
Bancorp has the positive intent and ability to hold
to maturity. Available-for-sale securities are those
the Bancorp may decide to sell if needed for
liquidity, asset-liability management or other
reasons. The Bancorp does not have a trading
portfolio. During 2006, the Bancorp did not have any
derivative instruments and was not involved in
hedging activities as defined by SFAS 133.
The Bancorps cost of funds reacts rapidly to
changes in market interest rates due to the
relatively short term nature of its deposit
liabilities. Consequently, the levels of short-term
interest rates have influenced the Bancorps results
of operations. In order to reduce exposure to
interest rate risk, core deposits (checking, NOW
accounts, savings and money market accounts) have
been marketed and certificate accounts have been
competitively priced. Core deposits provide a very
stable flow of funds and have been promoted by
offering competitive interest rates, quality service
and competitive service charges. Certificates with
maturities ranging from ten days to forty-two months
are offered. In addition, the Bank utilizes
borrowings, i.e. repurchase agreements and advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, as a
source of funds. Advances with maturities ranging
from one to five years are used to fund securities
and loans of comparable duration, as well as, to
reduce the impact that movements in short-term
interest rates have on the Bancorps overall cost of
funds. The Bancorp does not obtain funds through
brokers.
The Bancorps primary market risk exposure is
interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk
that the Bancorps earnings and capital will be
adversely affected by changes in interest rates. The
primary approach to interest rate risk management is
one that focuses on adjustments to the
8
Bancorps asset/liability mix in order to limit the
magnitude of interest rate risk. The Asset,
Liability, Capital & Technology Management Committee
of the Board is responsible for monitoring activity,
approving initiatives, reviewing reports, and
recommending strategies related to interest rate
risk. The Bancorps Asset/Liability Management
Committee (ALCO) is responsible for developing and
implementing an interest rate risk (IRR) management
strategy, establishing and maintaining a system of
limits and controls, and establishing and utilizing
an IRR measurement system. The ALCO generally meets
monthly with board presentations occurring
quarterly.
Performance from an interest rate risk
perspective can be measured in different ways.
Methodologies used by the Bancorp focus on net
interest income and the net economic value of equity.
Net interest income is defined as interest income
less interest expense. Variability in net interest
income arises because its components, interest income
and interest expense, do not change equally as rates
vary. This mismatch occurs because individual
assets and liabilities reprice differently as
rates change. Factors which affect net interest
income include changes in the level of interest
rates, changes in the relationship between earning
asset yields and the cost of interest bearing
liabilities, changes in the volume of assets and
liabilities outstanding, and changes in the
composition or mix of assets and liabilities.
Management uses rate shock (i.e. instantaneous and
sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve in 1%
increments up and down 2%) for stress testing the net
interest income under several rate change levels. In
order to simulate activity, maturing balances are
replaced with new balances at the new rate level and
repricing balances are adjusted to the new rate shock
level. The results are compared to limits set by the
Board of Directors and are monitored to identify
unfavorable trends.
Net economic value of equity is the net present
value of the Bancorps portfolio of assets and
liabilities. By marking-to-market the components of
the balance sheet, management can compute the net
economic value of equity. As rates change over time,
the market values of Bancorp assets and liabilities
will change, with longer-term products fluctuating
more than shorter-term products. In most cases,
rate-sensitive assets and liabilities will not have
the same maturity characteristics. Therefore, as
rates vary, the market value of the rate-sensitive
assets will not change equally with the market value
of rate-sensitive liabilities. This will cause the
net economic value of equity to vary. The focus of
the net economic value of equity is to determine the
percentage decline in the net economic value of
equity caused by a 2% increase or decrease in
interest rates, whichever produces the larger
decline. A large value indicates a large percentage
decline in the net economic value of equity due to
changes in interest rates and, thus, high interest
rate sensitivity. A low value indicates a small
percentage decline in the net economic value of
equity due to changes in interest rates and, thus,
low interest rate sensitivity. As with net interest
income, the results are compared to limits set by the
Board of Directors and are monitored to identify
unfavorable trends.
Presented in the following tables is
forward-looking information about the Bancorps
sensitivity to changes in interest rates as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005. The tables incorporate
the Bancorps internal system generated data as
related to the maturity and repayment/withdrawal of
interest earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities. Prepayment assumptions are based on
published data. Present value calculations use
current published market interest rates. For core
deposits that have no contractual maturity, the table
presents principal cash flows and, as applicable,
related weighted-average interest rates based
on the Bancorps historical experience,
managements judgment, statistical analysis, and
their most likely withdrawal behaviors.
Interest Rate Risk at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
Net Economic Value of Equity |
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy |
in rates |
|
Amount |
|
Change |
|
Limit |
|
Amount |
|
Change |
|
Limit |
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
15,707 |
|
|
|
-8.93 |
% |
|
|
-20.00 |
% |
|
$ |
53,318 |
|
|
|
-14.13 |
% |
|
|
-35 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
16,502 |
|
|
|
-4.32 |
% |
|
|
- 7.50 |
% |
|
$ |
57,950 |
|
|
|
- 6.67 |
% |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
17,247 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
62,089 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
17,656 |
|
|
|
-2.37 |
% |
|
|
- 7.50 |
% |
|
$ |
64,115 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
% |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
17,740 |
|
|
|
-2.86 |
% |
|
|
-20.00 |
% |
|
$ |
63,713 |
|
|
|
2.62 |
% |
|
|
-35 |
% |
Interest Rate Risk at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
Net Economic Value of Equity |
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy |
in rates |
|
Amount |
|
Change |
|
Limit |
|
Amount |
|
Change |
|
Limit |
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
20,849 |
|
|
|
-2.90 |
% |
|
|
-20.00 |
% |
|
$ |
54,700 |
|
|
|
-14.50 |
% |
|
|
-35 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
21,206 |
|
|
|
-1.20 |
% |
|
|
- 7.50 |
% |
|
$ |
59,368 |
|
|
|
- 7.20 |
% |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
21,464 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,004 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
21,014 |
|
|
|
-2.10 |
% |
|
|
- 7.50 |
% |
|
$ |
66,431 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
19,988 |
|
|
|
-6.90 |
% |
|
|
-20.00 |
% |
|
$ |
65,242 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
-35 |
% |
The tables show that the Bancorp has
managed interest rate risk within the policy limits
set by the Board of Directors. At December 31, 2006,
an increase in interest rates of 2% would have
resulted in a 8.9% decrease in net interest income
and a 14.1% decrease in the net economic value of
equity, compared to a 2.9% decrease in net interest
income and a 14.5% decrease in the net economic
value of equity at December 31, 2005. During 2006,
the Bancorp has managed interest rate risk by
generally selling residential fixed rate loans with
contractual maturities exceeding 15 years,
maintaining the short duration of the securities
portfolio, and implementing deposit pricing
strategies.
Financial Condition
During the year ended December 31, 2006, total
assets decreased by $8.5 million (1.3%), to $619.0
million, with interest-earning assets decreasing by
$7.9 million (1.4%). At December 31, 2006, interest
earning assets totaled $574.3 million and represented
92.8% of total assets. Loans totaled $471.7 million
and represented 82.1% of interest-earning assets,
76.2% of total assets and 92.0% of total deposits.
The loan portfolio, which is the Bancorps largest
asset, is a significant source of both interest and
fee income. The Bancorps lending strategy stresses
quality growth, product
9
diversification, and competitive and profitable
pricing. The loan portfolio includes $234.0 million
(49.6%) in residential real estate loans, $111.3
million (23.6%) in commercial real estate loans,
$48.7 million (10.3%) in construction and land
development loans, $46.8 million (9.9%) in commercial
business loans, $15.7 million (3.3%) in multifamily
loans, $12.3 million (2.6%) in government and other
loans, and $2.9 million (0.7%) in consumer loans.
During 2006, loans increased by $2.7 million (0.6%),
with increases taking place in loans secured by real
estate. Adjustable rate loans comprised 57.2% of
total loans at year-end. Management believes a
general slowdown in the national and local economies
may result in a softening in loan demand in all
categories.
During 2006, the Bancorp sold $9.2 million in
fixed rate mortgages originated for sale compared to
$5.6 million in 2005 and $3.9 million in 2004. Net
gains realized from the sales totaled $157 thousand,
$102 thousand and $234 thousand for 2006, 2005 and
2004. The current year increase in gain on sale of
loans is a result of the current interest rate
environment and an increase of loans originated for
sale. Net mortgage loan servicing fees totaled $12
thousand for 2006, $1 thousand for 2005 and $9
thousand for 2004. At December 31, 2006, the Bancorp
had no loans that were held for sale. During 2007,
the Bancorp expects to continue selling fixed rate
mortgage loans, with contractual maturities exceeding
fifteen years, on a case-by-case basis, as part of
its efforts to manage interest rate risk.
Non-performing loans include those loans that are
90 days or more past due and those loans that have
been placed on non-accrual status. Non-performing
loans totaled $3.1 million at December 31, 2006
compared to $2.1 million at December 31, 2005, an
increase of $967 thousand or 46%. The increase in
non-performing loans at December 31, 2006 is related
to two borrowers. The first borrower has one
commercial business loan and two loans secured by
real estate totaling $1.2 million that were placed in
non-accrual status during the first quarter of 2006.
These loans have been considered impaired at both
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. As a result,
the impaired loan balances were included in the
allowance for loan loss analysis at December 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005, and no additional provisions
were required for these loans during 2006. The second
borrower has one commercial real estate and one
commercial business loan totaling $725 thousand that
was placed in non-accrual status during the third
quarter of 2006. The ratio of non-performing loans to
total loans was 0.65% at December 31, 2006, compared
to 0.45% at December 31, 2005. The
ratio of non-performing loans to total assets was
0.50% at December 31, 2006, compared to 0.34% at
December 31, 2005. The December 31, 2006
non-performing loan balances include $2.9 million in
loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis and $182
thousand in accruing loans which were contractually
past due 90 days or more. Loans internally classified
as substandard totaled $6.9 million at December 31,
2006, compared to $3.2 million at December 31, 2005.
The increase in substandard loans is primarily
related to an increase in loans secured by
residential and commercial real estate loans. No
loans were classified as doubtful or loss.
Substandard loans include non-performing loans and
potential problem loans, where information about
possible credit issues or other conditions causes
management to question the ability of such borrowers
to comply with loan covenants or repayment terms. In
addition to identifying and monitoring non-performing
and other classified loans, management maintains a
list of watch loans. Watch loans represent loans
management is more closely monitoring due to one or
more factors that may cause the loan to become
classified. Watch loans totaled $7.6 million at
December 31, 2006, compared to $8.7 million at
December 31, 2005.
At December 31, 2006, impaired loans totaled
$1.9 million, compared to $1.7 million at December
31, 2005. The impaired loan balances were also
classified as non-performing loans at the end of both
periods. The December 31, 2006 impaired loan balances
consist of five impaired loans to two commercial
borrowers that are secured by business assets and
real estate, and are personally guaranteed by the
owner of the business. Impaired loans are loans where
full payment under the loan terms is not expected.
There were no other loans considered to be impaired
loans as of, or for the quarter ended, December 31,
2006.
At December 31, 2006, management is of the
opinion that there are no loans, except those
discussed above, where known information about
possible credit problems of borrowers causes
management to have serious doubts as to the ability
of such borrowers to comply with the present loan
repayment terms and which may result in disclosure of
such loans as non-accrual, past due or restructured
loans. Also, at December 31, 2006, there were no
other interest bearing assets that would be required
to be disclosed as non-accrual, past due,
restructured or potential problems if such assets
were loans. Management does not presently anticipate
that any of the non-performing loans or classified
loans would materially impact future operations,
liquidity or capital resources.
Notwithstanding the above, the Bancorp has a
$1.1 million participation in a $6.4 million letter
of credit, which acts as payment support to
bondholders. Bancorps
management currently believes that the
principal of the borrower has the financial capacity
to meet future bond repayment obligations. Cash
flows from the security collateralizing the letter
of credit have been negatively impacted due to the
closing of a major tenant. Management will continue
to monitor the letter of credit and bond repayments.
Because some loans may not be repaid in
accordance with contractual agreements, an allowance
for loan losses (ALL) has been maintained. While
management may periodically allocate portions of the
allowance for specific problem loans, the entire
allowance is available to absorb probable incurred
losses that arise from the loan portfolio and is not
segregated for, or allocated to, any particular loan
or group of loans. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006, $15 thousand in additions to the
ALL account were required, compared to $245 thousand
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005. The
December 31, 2005 ALL contained a specific allowance
for the collateral deficiency associated with three
loans totaling $1.4 million,
10
which had been classified as impaired at December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005, and placed in non-accrual
status during the first quarter of 2006. Recoveries,
net of charge-offs, totaled $71 thousand for the
current twelve months, compared to recoveries, net of
charge-offs of $44 thousand for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2005. Changes in the provision
take into consideration managements current
judgments about the credit quality of the loan
portfolio, loan portfolio growth, changes in the
portfolio mix and local economic conditions. In
determining the provision for loan loss for the
current period, management has given consideration to
increased risks associated within the local economy,
changes in loan mix and asset quality.
The determination of the amount of the ALL and
provisions for loan losses is based on managements
current judgments about the credit quality of the
loan portfolio with consideration given to all
known relevant internal and external factors that
affect loan collectibility as of the reporting
date. The appropriateness of the current year
provision and the overall adequacy of the ALL are
determined through a disciplined and consistently
applied quarterly process that combines a review of
the current position with a risk assessment
worksheet. The risk assessment worksheet covers the
residential, commercial real estate, commercial
business, and consumer loan portfolios. Management
uses a risk rating system to assist in determining
the appropriate level for the ALL. Management
assigns risk factors to non-performing loans; loans
that management has
internally classified as impaired; loans that
management has internally classified as
substandard, doubtful, loss, or watch; and
performing loans.
Risk factors for non-performing and internally
classified loans are based on an analysis of the
estimated collateral liquidation value for individual
loans defined as substandard, doubtful, loss or
watch. Estimated collateral liquidation values are
based on established loan underwriting standards and
adjusted for current mitigating factors on a
loan-by-loan basis. Aggregate substandard loan
collateral deficiencies are determined for
residential, commercial real estate, commercial
business, and consumer loan portfolios. These
deficiencies are then stated as a percentage of the
classified loan category to determine the appropriate
risk factors.
Risk factors for performing and non-classified
loans are based on the average net charge-offs for
the most recent five years, which are then stated as
a percentage of average loans for the same period.
Historical risk factors are calculated for
residential, commercial real estate, commercial
business, and consumer loans. The historical factors
are then adjusted for current subjective risks
attributable to: local and national economic factors;
loan growth and changes in loan composition;
organizational structure; composition of loan staff;
loan concentrations; policy changes and out of market
lending activity.
The ALL to total loans was 0.90% at December 31,
2006, compared to 0.89% at December 31, 2005, while
the ALL to non-performing loans (coverage ratio) was
138.6% at December 31, 2006, compared to 198.1% at
December 31, 2005. A consistently strong coverage
ratio is an indicator that sufficient provisions for
loan losses have been established. The December 31,
2006 balance in the
ALL account of $4.3 million is considered adequate
by management after evaluation of the loan
portfolio, past experience and current economic and
market conditions. While management may periodically
allocate portions of the allowance for specific
problem loans, the whole allowance is available for
any loan charge offs that occur. The allocation of
the ALL reflects performance and growth trends
within the various loan categories, as well as
consideration of the facts and circumstances that
affect the repayment of individual loans, and loans
which have been pooled as of the evaluation date,
with particular attention given to non-performing
loans and loans which have been classified as
substandard, doubtful or loss. Management has
allocated general reserves to both performing and
non-performing loans based on current information
available.
At December 31, 2006, the Bancorps investment
portfolio totaled $99.0 million and was invested as
follows: 40.9% in U.S. government agency debt
securities, 39.2% in U.S. government agency
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized
mortgage obligations, and 19.9% in municipal
securities. At December 31, 2006, securities
available-for-sale totaled $83.8 million or 84.6% of
total securities. Available-for-sale securities are
those the Bancorp may decide to sell if needed for
liquidity, asset-liability management or other
reasons. During 2006, securities increased by $8.9
million (9.9%). In addition, at December 31, 2006,
the Bancorp had $3.5 million in FHLB stock.
Deposits are a fundamental and cost-effective
source of funds for lending and other investment
purposes. The Bancorp offers a variety of products
designed to attract and retain customers, with the
primary focus on building and expanding
relationships. At December 31, 2006, deposits
totaled $512.9 million. During 2006, deposits
decreased by $12.8 million (2.4%). Savings accounts
decreased by $7.4 million (12.1%), money market
deposit accounts (MMDAs) decreased by $5.8 million
(4.1%), certificates of deposit decreased by $1.4
million (0.6%), while checking accounts increased by
$1.8 million (1.6%). The decrease in savings account
and certificate of deposit balances was a result of
the changing customer preference for alternative
market investments. The decrease in MMDAs was a
result of a planned withdrawal by a local
governmental unit. At December 31, 2006, the deposit
base was comprised of 21.1% checking, 26.8% MMDAs,
10.6% savings accounts, and 41.5% certificates of
deposit.
Borrowings are primarily used to fund asset
growth not supported by deposit generation. At
December 31, 2006, borrowed funds totaled $51.5
million compared to $51.2 million at December 31,
2005, an increase of $349 thousand (0.7%). Retail
repurchase agreements totaled $14.7 million at
December 31, 2006, compared to $12.1 million at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $2.6 million
(21.9%). FHLB advances totaled $32.0 million,
decreasing $5.5 million, as the Bancorp used excess
liquidity to repay maturing advances. In addition,
the Bancorps FHLB line of credit carried a balance
of $3.1 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $0
at December 31, 2005. Other short-term borrowings
totaled $1.7 million at December 31, 2006, compared
to $1.6 million at December 31, 2005.
11
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Bancorps primary goal for funds and
liquidity management is to ensure that at all
times it can meet the cash demands of its
depositors and its loan customers.
A secondary purpose of funds management is
profit management. Because profit and liquidity
are often conflicting objectives, management will
maximize the Banks net interest margin by making
adequate, but not excessive, liquidity
provisions. Furthermore, funds are managed so
that future profits will not be significantly
impacted because management uses expensive ways
of raising cash.
Changes in the liquidity position result from
operating, investing and financing activities. Cash
flows from operating activities are generally the
cash effects of transactions and other events that
enter into the determination of net income. The
primary investing activities include loan
originations, loan repayments, investments in
interest bearing balances in financial institutions,
dividend receipts and the purchase and maturity of
investment securities. Financing activities focus
almost entirely on the generation of customer
deposits. In addition, the Bancorp utilizes
borrowings (i.e., repurchase agreements and advances
from the FHLB) as a source of funds.
During 2006, cash and cash equivalents decreased
$24.1 million, compared to an increase of $23.4
million for 2005, and an increase of $328 thousand
for 2004. During 2006, the primary sources of cash
and cash equivalents were from the maturities and
sales of securities, loan sales and prepayments, FHLB
advances and cash from operating activities. The
primary uses of cash and cash equivalents were loan
originations and loan participations purchased, the
purchase of securities, deposit withdrawals and the
payment of common stock dividends. During 2006, cash
from operating activities decreased to $6.6 million,
compared to $7.1 million for 2005 and $7.9 million
for 2004. The 2006 decrease in cash provided by
operating activities was a result of the net change
in other assets. Cash outflows from investing
activities totaled $14.6 million during 2006,
compared to $48.4 million during 2005 and $50.8
million for 2004. The decrease during 2006 was due
primarily to a reduction in loan originations. The
net change in loans receivable and loan
participations purchased totaled $2.9 million during
2006, compared to $35.2 million during 2005 and $36.7
million for 2004. Cash outflows from financing
activities totaled $16.1 million in 2006, compared to
$64.7 million in 2005 and $43.2 million in 2004. The
change during
2006 was primarily due to a net decrease in
deposit balances. Deposits decreased by $12.8 million
during 2006, compared to an increase of $74.2 million
for 2005 and $29.9 million for 2004. The 2006
decrease in deposits was a result of a planned
withdrawal of a short-term local government deposit.
FHLB advances decreased by $5.5 million during 2006,
compared to a decrease of $2.0 million during 2005,
and an increase of $13.0 million during 2004. The
Bancorp paid dividends on common stock of $3.8
million during 2006, compared to $3.6 million during
2005 and $3.4 million for 2004.
Management strongly believes that safety and
soundness is enhanced by maintaining a high level of
capital. During 2006, stockholders equity increased
by $3.6 million (7.7%). The increase resulted
primarily from earnings of $6.5 million for 2006.
Additional items increasing stockholders equity were
$246 thousand from the issuance of 15,348 shares of
common stock from stock-based compensation plans,
$107 thousand from the recognition of the overfunded
status of the Banks postretirement medical plan, $67
thousand from stock-based compensation expense and
$593 thousand from the net change in unrealized loss
on available-for-sale securities. Decreasing
stockholders equity was the Bancorps declaration of
$3.9 million in cash dividends. At December 31, 2006,
book value per share was $17.86 compared to $16.67 at
December 31, 2005.
The Bancorp is subject to risk-based capital
guidelines adopted by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (the FRB), and the Bank is
subject to risk-based capital guidelines adopted by
the FDIC. As applied to the Bancorp and the Bank, the
FRB and FDIC capital requirements are substantially
the same. These regulations divide capital into two
tiers. The first tier (Tier 1) includes common
equity, certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred
stock and minority interests in equity accounts of
consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and certain
other intangible assets. Supplementary (Tier 2)
capital includes, among other things, cumulative
perpetual and long-term limited-life preferred stock,
mandatory convertible securities, certain hybrid
capital instruments, term subordinated debt and the
allowance for loan losses, subject to certain
limitations, less required deductions. The Bancorp
and the Bank are required to maintain a total
risk-based capital ratio of 8%, of which 4% must be
Tier 1 capital. In addition, the FRB and FDIC
regulations provide for a minimum Tier 1 leverage
ratio (Tier 1 capital to adjusted average assets) of
3% for financial institutions that meet certain
specified criteria, including that they have the
highest regulatory rating and are not experiencing or
anticipating significant
growth. All other financial institutions are
required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3%
plus an additional cushion of at least one to two
percent.
The following table shows that, at December 31,
2006, the Bancorps capital exceeded all regulatory
capital requirements. At December 31, 2006, the
Bancorps and the Banks regulatory capital ratios
were substantially the same. The dollar amounts are
in millions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required for |
|
To Be Well |
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequate Capital |
|
Capitalized |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Total capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
54,665 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
$ |
36.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
50,398 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to
adjusted average assets |
|
$ |
50,398 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
12
Contractual Obligations, Commitments,
Contingent Liabilities, and Off-balance Sheet
Arrangements
The following table presents the Bancorps
consolidated long term contractual obligations, as
well as commitments to extend credit to our
borrowers, in aggregate and by payment due dates at
December 31, 2006. Dollar amounts are in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
One through |
|
|
Four through |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Three Years |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Total |
|
Long-term
contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
$ |
202,256 |
|
|
$ |
11,076 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
213,332 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
Limited partnership
obligation |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term contractual
obligations |
|
|
222,316 |
|
|
|
23,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,392 |
|
Commitments to extend credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance standby
letters of credit |
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
4,026 |
|
At December 31, 2006, outstanding
commitments to fund loans totaled $95.3 million.
Approximately 80% of the commitments were at variable
rates. Management believes that the Bancorp has
sufficient cash flow and borrowing capacity to fund
all outstanding commitments and to maintain proper
levels of liquidity. Except for the items disclosed
in the table above, the Bancorp has no other
off-balance sheet arrangements, which will have a
current or future effect on results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or resources.
At December 31, 2006, management is not aware of
any current recommendations by the regulatory
authorities, which if they were to be
implemented, would have a material effect on the
Bancorps liquidity, capital resources or operations.
Results of Operations -
Comparison of 2006 to 2005
Net income for 2006 was $6.5 million, compared
to $6.7 million for 2005, a decrease of $197
thousand (3.0%). The Bancorps earnings were
impacted by challenges that constrained revenue
growth, one from persistent high short-term interest
rates, the persistent inverted yield curve and
continued consolidation through mergers that
negatively impacted lending activity. Contributing
to the Bancorps earnings were asset quality,
increased noninterest income from banking activities
and stable operating expenses. The earnings
represent a return on average assets of 1.04% for
2006 compared to 1.14% for 2005. The return on
average equity was 13.42% for 2006 compared to
14.67% for 2005.
Net interest income for 2006 was $19.2 million, a
decrease of $1.0 million (5.1%) from $20.3 million
for 2005. The decrease in net interest income was
affected by the Federal Reserves action to raise
interest rates and the subsequent inverted yield
curve, a term that describes short-term interest
rates having yields higher than long-term rates.
Under such conditions, the increase in yields earned
on loans and investments generally lag the increases
in rates paid to depositors as well as the rates on
bank borrowings. The weighted-average yield on
interest-earning assets was 6.02% for 2006 compared
to 5.50% for 2005. The weighted-average cost of funds
was 2.77% for 2006 compared to 1.82% for 2005. The
impact of the 6.02% return on interest earning assets
and the 2.77% cost of funds resulted in a net
interest spread of 3.25% for 2006 compared to 3.68%
for 2005. During 2006, total interest income
increased by $5.0 million (16.5%) while total
interest expense increased by $6.0 million (61.3%).
The net interest margin was 3.31% for 2006 compared
to 3.71% for 2005. During 2006, the Bancorp continued
to focus on reducing its effective tax rate by
investing in tax-exempt securities and loans. As a
result, the Bancorps tax equivalent net interest
margin for 2006 was 3.41% compared to 3.80% for 2005.
During 2006, interest income from loans
increased by $4.2 million (15.8%) compared to 2005.
The increase was due to an increase in average loan
balances and increased yields. The weighted-average
yield on loans outstanding was 6.44% for 2006
compared to 5.92% for 2005. Loan balances averaged
$472.2 million for 2006, up $28.7 million (6.5%) from
$443.5 million for 2005. During
2006, interest income from securities and other
interest earning assets increased by $794 thousand
(21.1%) compared to 2005. The increase was due to
higher average balances and an increase in portfolio
yields. The weighted-average yield on securities and
other interest earning assets was 4.19% for 2006
compared to 3.67% for 2005. Securities and other
interest earning assets averaged $108.8 million for
2006, up $6.4 million (6.3%) from $102.4 million for
2005.
Interest expense for deposits increased by $5.5
million (69.4%) during 2006 compared to 2005. The
change was due to an increase in the weighted-average
rate paid on deposits and increased average balances.
The weighted-average rate paid on deposits for 2006
was 2.65% compared to 1.82% for 2005. The higher cost
of funds was a result of MMDA and certificates of
deposit growth in a higher rate environment, and a
decrease in savings account average balances. Total
deposit balances averaged $507.8 million for 2006, up
$24.9 million (5.2%) from $482.9 million for 2005.
Interest expense on borrowed funds increased by $466
thousand (25.7%) during 2006 due to an increase in
average daily balances and an increase in cost of
borrowing. The weighted-average cost of borrowed
funds was 3.78% for 2006 compared to 3.34% for 2005.
Borrowed funds averaged $60.2 million during 2006, up
$5.9 million (10.9%) from $54.3 million for 2005. The
lower marginal cost of acquiring borrowed funds
provides a cost-effective supplement to deposits for
funding interest-earning asset growth.
Noninterest income was $4.2 million for 2006, up
$679 thousand (19.2%) from $3.5 million during 2005.
During 2006, fees and service charges from account
related services increased $541 thousand (22.5%). The
increase was primarily due to fees from deposit
accounts. Fees from wealth management operations
totaled $657 thousand for 2006, compared to $601
thousand for 2005, an increase of $56 thousand
(9.3%). Income from increases in the cash
13
value of bank owned life insurance totaled $365
thousand for 2006, compared to $310 for 2005, an
increase of $55 thousand (17.7%). During 2006, the
Bancorp reported $157 thousand in gains on sales of
loans compared to $102 thousand for 2005, an
increase of $55 thousand (54.0%). Gain on sale of
foreclosed real estate totaled $43 thousand during
2006, compared to $8 thousand for 2005, an increase
of $35 thousand (437.5%). In addition, the Bancorp
reported $3 thousand in gains on the sale of
securities during 2006, compared to gains of $70
thousand for 2005.
Noninterest expense for 2006 was $14.3 million,
up $525 thousand (3.8%) from $13.8 million for 2005.
During the current year, compensation and benefits
totaled $7.3 million, an increase of $150 thousand
(2.1%) compared to $7.2 million for 2005. The
increase was primarily due to increased compensation,
due to annual salary increases and the recognition of
stock-based employee compensation in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share-based Payment, which was adopted in 2006.
Occupancy and equipment totaled $2.4 million for
2006, an increase of $156 thousand (7.0%) compared to
$2.2 million for 2005. The increase was a result of
additional depreciation expense for equipment and
technology expenditures. Data processing totaled $827
thousand for 2006, an increase of $53 thousand
(6.8%), compared to $774 thousand for 2005. The
change was a result of increased utilization and
transaction volume with the Bancorps core data
processing system. Statement and check processing
totaled $348 thousand for 2006, compared to $368
thousand for 2005. Marketing expense totaled $325
thousand for 2006, an increase of $55 thousand
(20.2%), compared to $270 thousand for 2005. The
marketing expense change was a result of increased
market communication of the Bancorps brand.
Professional services expense related to the
utilization of third parties totaled $378 thousand
for 2006, an increase of $136 thousand (56.0%),
compared to $242 for 2005. The increase was a result
of the formation of the Bancorps real estate
investment trust. Other expense totaled $2.7 million
for 2006 and 2005. The Bancorps efficiency ratio for
2006 was 60.9% compared to 57.9% for 2005. The ratio
is determined by dividing total noninterest expense
by the sum of net interest income and total
noninterest income for the period.
Income tax expenses for 2006 totaled $2.7
million compared to $3.1 million for 2005, a decrease
of $444 thousand (14.2%). The combined effective
federal and state tax rates for the Bancorp were
29.3% for 2006 and 31.8% for 2005. The decrease was
due to an increased investment in tax-exempt
investments, loans, bank owned life insurance and the
formation of a real estate investment trust.
Results of Operations -
Comparison of 2005 to 2004
Net income for 2005 was $6.7 million, compared to
$6.3 million for 2004, an increase of $382 thousand
(6.1%), principally due to consistent core earnings,
asset quality, increased noninterest income from
banking activities and stable operating expenses. The
earnings represent a return on average assets of
1.14% for 2005 compared to 1.17% for 2004. The return
on average equity was 14.67% for 2005 compared to
14.64% for 2004.
Net interest income for 2005 was $20.3 million,
up $510 thousand (2.6%) from $19.8 million for 2004.
The increase in net interest income was due to an
increase in average loan and core deposit balances.
The rising interest rate environment during 2005
resulted in increased yields for investments and
loans, as maturing securities were reinvested at
higher rates and new loan production carried higher
yields. During 2005, the cost of funds increased
faster than earning asset yields due to the maturity
structure of the Bancorps certificates of deposit,
growth in MMDAs, and a reduction in checking and
savings account balances. The weighted-average yield
on interest-earning assets was 5.50% for 2005
compared to 5.31% for 2004. The weighted-average cost
of funds was 1.82% for 2005 compared to 1.40% for
2004. The impact of the 5.50% return on interest
earning assets and the 1.82% cost of funds resulted
in a net interest spread of 3.68% for 2005 compared
to 3.91% for 2004. During 2005, total interest income
increased by $3.4 million (12.8%) while total
interest expense increased by $2.9 million (42.3%).
The net interest margin was 3.71% for 2005 compared
to 3.94% for 2004. During 2005, the Bancorp continued
to focus on reducing its effective tax rate by
investing in tax-exempt securities and loans. As a
result, the Bancorps tax equivalent net interest
margin for 2005 was 3.80% compared to 3.97% for 2004.
During 2005, interest income from loans
increased by $2.6 million (10.8%) compared to 2004.
The increase was due to an increase in average loan
balances and increased yields. The weighted-average
yield on loans outstanding was 5.92% for 2005
compared to 5.71% for 2004. Loan balances averaged
$443.5 million for 2005, up $28.4 million (6.8%) from
$415.1 million for 2004. During 2005, interest income
from securities and other interest earning assets
increased by $855 thousand (29.4%) compared to 2004.
The increase was due to higher average balances and
an increase in portfolio yields. The weighted-average
yield on securities and other interest earning assets
was 3.67% for 2005 compared to 3.37% for 2004.
Securities and other interest earning assets averaged
$102.4 million for 2005, up $16.3 million (18.9%)
from $86.1 million for 2004.
Interest expense for deposits increased by $2.6
million (48.8%) during 2005 compared to 2004. The
change was due to an increase in the weighted-average
rate paid on deposits and increased average balances.
The weighted-average rate paid on deposits for 2005
was 1.82% compared to 1.40% for 2004. The higher cost
of funds was a result of MMDA and certificates of
deposit growth in a rising rate environment, and a
decrease in low cost checking and savings account
average balances. Total deposit balances averaged
$482.9 million for 2005, up
$42.1 million (9.6%) from $440.8 million for
2004. Interest expense on borrowed funds increased by
$293 thousand (19.3%) during 2005 due to an increase
in average daily balances and an increase in the
14
cost of borrowing. The weighted-average cost of
borrowed funds was 3.34% for 2005 compared to 3.10%
for 2004. Borrowed funds averaged $54.3 million
during 2005, up $5.3 million (10.8%) from $49.0
million for 2004. Borrowed funds have provided a
cost-effective supplement to deposits for funding
interest-earning asset growth.
Noninterest income was $3.5 million for 2005, up
$228 thousand (6.9%) from $3.3 million during 2004.
During 2005, fees and service charges increased $287
thousand (13.5%). The increase was primarily due to
fees from deposit accounts and an increase in the
cash value of bank owned life insurance. Fees from
wealth management operations totaled $601 thousand
for 2005, compared to $498 thousand for 2004, an
increase of $103 thousand (20.7%). During 2005, the
Bancorp reported $102 thousand in gains on sales of
loans compared to $234 thousand for 2004, a decrease
of $132 thousand (54.4%). Gains on securities totaled
$70 thousand during 2005 compared to $284 thousand
for 2004, a decrease of $214 thousand (75.4%). The
decrease in gains on sales of loans and securities
was a result of fewer sales due to the current
interest rate environment. Income from the increase
in the cash value of bank owned life insurance
totaled $310 thousand during the current year,
compared to $147 thousand in 2004, an increase of
$163 thousand (110.9%). In addition, the Bancorp
reported $8 thousand in gains on the sale of
foreclosed real estate during 2005 compared to gains
of $1 thousand for 2004.
Noninterest expense for 2005 was $13.8 million,
up $597 thousand (4.5%) from $13.2 million for 2004.
During the current year, compensation and benefits
totaled $7.2 million, an increase of $342 thousand
(5.0%) compared to $6.8 million for 2004. The
increase was primarily due to increased compensation,
due to annual salary increases, and additional
staffing for current banking operations. Occupancy
and equipment totaled $2.23 million for 2005, an
increase of $30 thousand (1.4%) compared to $2.20
million for 2004. Marketing expense totaled $270
thousand for 2005, an increase of $37 thousand
(15.9%), compared to $233 thousand for 2004. The
marketing expense change was a result of increased
market communication of the Bancorps brand, while
selling its products and services. Data processing
totaled $774 thousand for 2005, an increase of $51
thousand (7.1%), compared to $723 thousand for 2004.
The change was a result of increased transaction
volume with the Bancorps core data processing
system. Other
expense totaled $3.1 million for 2005, an
increase of $193 thousand (6.7%) from $2.9 million
for 2004. The increase was primarily due to expense
associated with the imaging of customer checks and
account statements, which was implemented during
August 2004. The Bancorps efficiency ratio for 2005
was 57.9% compared to 57.1% for 2004.
Income tax expenses for 2005 totaled $3.1
million compared to $3.2 million for 2004, a
decrease of $101 thousand (3.1%). The combined
effective federal and state tax rates for the
Bancorp were 31.8% for 2005 and 33.9% for 2004.
The decrease was due to an increased investment
in tax-exempt investments, loans and bank owned
life insurance.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those
accounting policies that management believes are
most important to the portrayal of the Bancorps
financial condition and that require managements
most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. The
Bancorps most critical accounting policy is
summarized below. Other accounting policies,
including those related to the fair values of
financial statements and the status of
contingencies, are summarized in Note 1 to the
Bancorps consolidated financial statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses The Bancorp
maintains an Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL) to
absorb probable incurred credit losses that arise
from the loan portfolio. The ALL is increased by the
provision for loan losses, and decreased by
charge-offs net of recoveries. The determination of
the amounts of the ALL and provisions for loan losses
is based upon managements current judgments about
the credit quality of the loan portfolio with
consideration given to all known relevant internal
and external factors that affect loan collectibility.
The methodology used to determine the current year
provision and the overall adequacy of the ALL
includes a disciplined and consistently applied
quarterly process that combines a review of the
current position with a risk assessment worksheet.
Factors that are taken into consideration in the
analysis include an assessment of national and local
economic trends, a review of current year loan
portfolio growth and changes in portfolio mix, and an
assessment of trends for loan delinquencies and loan
charge-off activity. Particular attention is given
to non-accruing loans and accruing loans past due 90
days or more, and loans that have been classified as
substandard, doubtful, or loss. Changes in the
provision are directionally consistent with changes
in observable data.
Commercial and industrial, and commercial real
estate loans that exhibit credit weaknesses and loans
that have been classified as impaired are subject to
an individual review. Where appropriate, ALL
allocations are made to these loans based on
managements assessment of financial position,
current cash flows, collateral values, financial
strength of guarantors, industry trends, and economic
conditions. ALL allocations for homogeneous loans,
such as residential mortgage loans and consumer
loans, are based on historical charge-off activity
and current delinquency trends.
Management has allocated general reserves to both
performing and non-performing loans based on
historical data and current information available.
Risk factors for non-performing and internally
classified loans are based on an analysis of the
estimated collateral liquidation value for individual
loans defined as substandard or doubtful. Estimated
collateral liquidation values are based on
established loan underwriting standards and adjusted
for current mitigating factors on a loan-by-loan
basis. Aggregate substandard loan collateral
deficiencies are determined for residential,
commercial real estate, commercial business, and
consumer loan portfolios. These deficiencies are then
stated as a percentage of the total substandard
balances to determine the appropriate risk factors.
Risk factors for performing and non-classified
loans are based on the average net charge-offs for
the most recent five years, which are then stated as
a percentage of average loans
15
for the same period. Historical risk factors are
calculated for residential, commercial real estate,
commercial business, and consumer loans. The
historical factors are then adjusted for current
subjective risks attributable to: local and national
economic factors; loan growth and changes in loan
composition; organizational structure; composition of
loan staff; loan concentrations; policy changes and
out of market lending activity.
The risk factors are applied to these types of
loans to determine the appropriate level for the
ALL. Adjustments may be made to these allocations
that reflect managements judgment on current
conditions, delinquency trends, and charge-off
activity.
The Bancorp has not made any significant
changes to its overall approach in the
determination of the ALL for all periods reported.
There have been no material changes in assumptions
or estimation techniques. Based on the above
discussion, management believes that the
ALL is currently adequate, but not excessive,
given the risk inherent in the loan portfolio.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related data
presented herein have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, which require the
measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars, without
considering changes in the relative purchasing power
of money over time due to inflation. The primary
assets and liabilities of the Bancorp are monetary in
nature. As a result, interest rates have a more
significant impact on the Bancorps performance than
the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest
rates do not necessarily move in the same direction
or magnitude as the prices of goods and services.
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this report that are not
historical facts are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words or phrases
would be, will allow, intends to, will likely
result, are expected to, will continue, is
anticipated, estimate, project, or similar
expressions are also intended to identify
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. The
Bancorp cautions readers that forward-looking
statements, including without limitation, those
relating to the Bancorps future business prospects,
interest income and expense, net income, liquidity,
and capital needs are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated in the
forward-looking statements, due to, among other
things, factors identified in this report, including
the following:
Regulatory Risk. The banking industry is heavily
regulated. As discussed above, the Bancorp and
Bank are subject to regulation and supervision by
the DFI, FDIC, FRB, and SEC (Securities and
Exchange Commission). The burden imposed by
federal and state regulations puts banks at a
competitive disadvantage compared to less
regulated competitors such as finance companies,
mortgage banking companies and leasing companies.
The banking industry continues to lose market
share to competitors.
Legislation. Because of concerns relating to
the competitiveness and the safety and soundness of
the industry, Congress continues to consider a
number of
wide-ranging proposals for altering the
structure, regulation, and competitive relationships
of the nations financial institutions. Among such
bills are proposals to combine banks and thrifts
under a unified charter, to combine regulatory
agencies, and to further expand the powers of
depository institutions, bank holding companies, and
competitors of depository institutions. Management
cannot predict whether or in what form any of these
proposals will be adopted or the extent to which the
business of the Bancorp or the Bank may be affected
thereby.
Credit Risk. One of the greatest risks facing
lenders is credit risk, that is, the risk of losing
principal and interest due to a borrowers failure to
perform according to the terms of a loan agreement.
While management attempts to provide an allowance for
loan losses at a level adequate to cover probable
incurred losses based on loan portfolio growth, past
loss experience, general economic conditions,
information about specific borrower situations, and
other factors, future adjustments to reserves may
become necessary, and net income could be
significantly affected, if circumstances differ
substantially from assumptions used with respect to
such factors.
Exposure to Local Economic Conditions. The
Banks primary market area for deposits and loans
encompasses Lake County, in northwest Indiana, where
all of its offices are located. Ninety-five percent
of the Banks business activities are within this
area. This concentration exposes the Bank to risks
resulting from changes in the local economy. A
dramatic drop in local real estate values would, for
example, adversely affect the quality of the Banks
loan portfolio.
Interest Rate Risk. The Bancorps earnings
depend to a great extent upon the level of net
interest income, which is the difference between
interest income earned on loans and investments and
the interest expense paid on deposits and other
borrowings. Interest rate risk is the risk that the
earnings and capital will be adversely affected by
changes in interest rates. Further discussion of
interest rate risk can be found under the caption
Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations section of this
document.
Competition. The activities of the Bancorp and
the Bank in the geographic market served involve
competition with other banks as well as with other
financial institutions and enterprises, many of which
have substantially greater resources than those
available to the Bancorp. In addition, non-bank
competitors are generally
not subject to the extensive regulation
applicable to the Bancorp and the Bank.
16
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors
NorthWest Indiana
Bancorp
Munster, Indiana
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NorthWest Indiana Bancorp
(Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of NorthWest Indiana Bancorp as of December 31, 2006 and
2005, and the results of their operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2006 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As disclosed in Note 1, during 2006 the Company adopted new accounting guidance for post-retirement
benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
South Bend, Indiana
March 13, 2007
17
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and noninterest bearing balances in financial institutions |
|
$ |
15,764 |
|
|
$ |
19,772 |
|
Interest bearing balances in financial institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
15,764 |
|
|
|
39,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
83,765 |
|
|
|
76,382 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity; fair value: December 31, 2006 - $15,380
December 31, 2005 - $13,668 |
|
|
15,247 |
|
|
|
13,711 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
471,716 |
|
|
|
469,043 |
|
Less: allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(4,267 |
) |
|
|
(4,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans receivable |
|
|
467,449 |
|
|
|
464,862 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
14,603 |
|
|
|
14,510 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
Cash value of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
10,822 |
|
|
|
8,457 |
|
Investment in real estate limited partnerships |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
618,982 |
|
|
$ |
627,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing |
|
$ |
43,889 |
|
|
$ |
49,204 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
469,042 |
|
|
|
476,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
512,931 |
|
|
|
525,731 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
51,501 |
|
|
|
51,153 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
568,972 |
|
|
|
581,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par or stated value;
10,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par or stated value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares issued: December 31, 2006 - 2,870,437
December 31, 2005 - 2,856,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding: December 31, 2006 - 2,799,814
December 31, 2005 - 2,785,916 |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
46,952 |
|
|
|
44,388 |
|
Treasury stock, common shares at cost: December 31, 2006 and 2005 - 70,623 |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
50,010 |
|
|
|
46,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
618,982 |
|
|
$ |
627,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
18
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans |
|
$ |
25,819 |
|
|
$ |
22,364 |
|
|
$ |
21,007 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
4,356 |
|
|
|
3,633 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan interest |
|
|
30,425 |
|
|
|
26,264 |
|
|
|
23,709 |
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
2,517 |
|
Tax exempt securities |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Other interest earning assets |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
34,979 |
|
|
|
30,024 |
|
|
|
26,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
13,460 |
|
|
|
7,946 |
|
|
|
5,339 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
15,738 |
|
|
|
9,758 |
|
|
|
6,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
19,241 |
|
|
|
20,266 |
|
|
|
19,756 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
19,226 |
|
|
|
20,021 |
|
|
|
19,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges |
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
2,122 |
|
Wealth management operations |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Gain on sale of loans, net |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
Gain on securities, net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Gain on sale of foreclosed real estate |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
4,219 |
|
|
|
3,540 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
7,179 |
|
|
|
6,837 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
Statement and check processing |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
14,296 |
|
|
|
13,771 |
|
|
|
13,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expenses |
|
|
9,149 |
|
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
9,509 |
|
Income tax expenses |
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
|
$ |
6,672 |
|
|
$ |
6,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.32 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
19
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Total |
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at January 1, 2004 |
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
3,567 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
38,534 |
|
|
$ |
(1,440 |
) |
|
$ |
41,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,290 |
|
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on securities
available-for-sale, net of reclassification
and tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,570 |
|
Issuance of 18,747 shares of common stock
at $10.63 - $30.00 per share, under
stock-based compensation plans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
Cash dividends, $1.24 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
41,392 |
|
|
|
(1,440 |
) |
|
|
44,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,672 |
|
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on securities
available-for-sale, net of reclassification
and tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,763 |
|
Issuance of 15,560 shares of common stock at
$10.63 - $35.50 per share, under stock-based
compensation plans, including related tax effects |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Cash dividends, $1.32 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
44,388 |
|
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
46,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,475 |
|
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on securities
available-for-sale, net of reclassification
and tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,068 |
|
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158,
net of tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
Issuance of 15,348 shares of common stock at
$10.63 - $35.50 per share, under stock-based
compensation plans, including related tax effects |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
Cash dividends, $1.40 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
4,610 |
|
|
$ |
(389 |
) |
|
$ |
46,952 |
|
|
$ |
(1,522 |
) |
|
$ |
50,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
20
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
|
$ |
6,672 |
|
|
$ |
6,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination of loans for sale |
|
|
(9,141 |
) |
|
|
(5,499 |
) |
|
|
(3,835 |
) |
Sale of loans originated for sale |
|
|
9,234 |
|
|
|
5,591 |
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
Depreciation and amortization, net of accretion |
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Amortization of investment in real estate
limited partnerships |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Equity in (gain)/loss of investments in limited partnership,
net of interest received |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
Net gains on sale of securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
Net gains on sale of loans |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
Net gain on sale of foreclosed real estate |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Cash value of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
732 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
6,570 |
|
|
|
7,126 |
|
|
|
7,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns
of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
13,352 |
|
|
|
8,703 |
|
|
|
21,849 |
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
8,777 |
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
Purchase of securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(23,137 |
) |
|
|
(26,126 |
) |
|
|
(39,500 |
) |
Purchase of securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
(2,939 |
) |
|
|
(7,925 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns
of securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans transferred to held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,166 |
|
Loan participations purchased |
|
|
(12,354 |
) |
|
|
(23,121 |
) |
|
|
(17,756 |
) |
Net change in loans receivable |
|
|
9,413 |
|
|
|
(12,084 |
) |
|
|
(18,985 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
(1,687 |
) |
|
|
(994 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
(14,582 |
) |
|
|
(48,435 |
) |
|
|
(50,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in deposits |
|
|
(12,800 |
) |
|
|
74,158 |
|
|
|
29,933 |
|
Proceeds from FHLB advances |
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Repayment of FHLB advances |
|
|
(31,500 |
) |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
Change in other borrowed funds |
|
|
5,848 |
|
|
|
(4,048 |
) |
|
|
3,306 |
|
Tax effect of nonqualified stock option exercise |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(3,849 |
) |
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
(3,398 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
(16,055 |
) |
|
|
64,742 |
|
|
|
43,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(24,067 |
) |
|
|
23,433 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
39,831 |
|
|
|
16,398 |
|
|
|
16,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
15,764 |
|
|
$ |
39,831 |
|
|
$ |
16,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
7,560 |
|
|
$ |
9,612 |
|
|
$ |
6,868 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
3,230 |
|
|
$ |
2,965 |
|
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from loans to foreclosed real estate |
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
Transfers from loans to loans held for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,202 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
21
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
NOTE 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation The
consolidated financial statements include NorthWest
Indiana Bancorp (the Bancorp), its wholly owned
subsidiary, Peoples Bank SB (the Bank), and the
Banks wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples Service
Corporation and NWIN, LLC. The Bancorp has no other
business activity other than being a holding company
for the Bank. The Bancorps earnings are dependent
upon the earnings of the Bank. Peoples Service
Corporation provides insurance and annuity
investments to the Banks wealth management
customers. NWIN, LLC is located in Las Vegas, Nevada
and serves as the Banks investment subsidiary and
parent of a real estate investment trust, NWIN
Funding, Inc.
NWIN Funding, Inc. was formed on September 1,
2006 as an Indiana Real Estate Investment Trust. The
formation of NWIN Funding, Inc. provides the Bancorp
with a vehicle that may be used to raise capital,
utilizing portfolio mortgages as collateral, without
diluting stock ownership. In addition, NWIN Funding,
Inc. will receive favorable state tax treatment for
income generated by its operations. All significant
inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates Preparing financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting period, as
well as the disclosures provided. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Estimates
associated with the allowance for loan losses, loan
servicing rights, fair values of financial
instruments and status of contingencies are
particularly susceptible to material change in the
near term.
Concentrations of Credit Risk The Bancorp
grants residential, commercial real estate,
commercial business and installment loans to
customers primarily of Lake County, in northwest
Indiana. Substantially all loans are secured by
specific items of collateral including residences,
commercial real estate, business assets and
consumer assets.
Cash Flow Reporting For purposes of the
statement of cash flows, the Bancorp considers cash
on hand, noninterest bearing balances in financial
institutions, all
interest-bearing balances in financial
institutions with original maturities of ninety days
or less and federal funds sold to be cash and cash
equivalents. The Bancorp reports net cash flows for
customer loan and deposit transactions and short-term
borrowings with maturities of 90 days or less.
Interest-bearing Deposits in Other Financial Institutions -
Interest bearing deposits in other financial
institutions mature within one year and are
carried at cost.
Securities The Bancorp classifies securities into
held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading
categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those
which management has the positive intent and the
Bancorp the ability to hold to maturity, and are
reported at amortized cost. Available-for-sale
securities are those the Bancorp may decide to sell
if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management
or other reasons. Available-for-sale securities are
reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and
losses reported in other comprehensive income. The
Bancorp does not have a trading portfolio. Realized
gains and losses resulting from the sale of
securities recorded on the trade date are computed by
the specific identification method. Interest and
dividend income, adjusted by amortization of premium
or discount on a level yield method are included in
earnings. Securities are written down to fair value
when a decline in fair value is not temporary.
Declines in the fair value of securities below
their cost that are other than temporary are
reflected as realized losses. In estimating other
than temporary losses, management considers: (1) the
length of time and extent that fair value has been
less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near
term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the Bancorps
ability and intent to hold the security for a period
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
fair value.
Loans Held for Sale Mortgage loans
originated and intended for sale in the secondary
market are carried at the lower of aggregate cost
or market, as determined by outstanding
commitments from investors. Net unrealized losses,
if any, are recorded as a valuation allowance and
charged to earnings.
Mortgage loans held for sale are generally sold
with servicing rights retained. The carrying value
of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost
allocated to the servicing rights. Gains and losses
on sales of mortgage loans are based on the
difference between the selling price and the
carrying value of the related loan sold.
Loans and Loan Income Loans that management
has the intent and ability to hold for the
foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are
reported at the principal balance outstanding, net
of unearned interest, deferred loan fees and costs,
and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is
accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan
origination fees, net of certain direct origination
costs, are deferred and recognized in interest
income using the level yield method without
anticipating prepayments.
Interest income on mortgage and commercial
loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90
days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and
in process of collection. Consumer loans are
typically charged off no later than 120 days past
due. Past due status is based on the contractual
terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on
non-accrual or charged-off at an earlier date if
collection of principal or interest is considered
doubtful.
All interest accrued but not received for loans
placed on non-accrual is reversed against interest
income. Interest received on such loans is accounted
for on the cash-basis or cost recovery method, until
qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned
to accrual status when all the principal and
interest amounts contractually due are brought
current and future payments are reasonably assured.
22
Allowance for Loan Losses The allowance for
loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable
incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged
against the allowance when management believes the
uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed.
Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance. Management estimates the allowance balance
required using past loan loss experience, the nature
and volume of the portfolio, information about
specific borrower situations and estimated collateral
values, economic conditions, and other factors.
Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific
loans, but the entire allowance is available for any
loan that, in managements judgment, should be
charged off.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on
current information and events, it is probable that
the Bancorp will be unable to collect the scheduled
payments of principal or interest when due according
to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Factors considered by management in determining
impairment include payment status, collateral value,
and the probability of collecting scheduled principal
and interest payments when due. Loans that experience
insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls
generally are not classified as
impaired. Management determines the significance
of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case by
case basis, taking into consideration all of the
circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower,
including the length of the delay, the reasons for
the delay, the borrowers prior payment record, and
the amount of the shortfall in relation to the
principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured
on a loan by loan basis for commercial and
construction loans by either the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate, the loans obtainable market
price, or the fair value of the collateral if the
loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller
balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated
for impairment. Accordingly, the Bancorp does not
separately identify individual consumer and
residential loans for impairment disclosures.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock The Bank is a
member of the FHLB system. Members are required to
own a certain amount of stock based on the level of
borrowings and other factors, and may invest in
additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost,
classified as a restricted security, and periodically
evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery
of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are
reported as income.
Premises and Equipment Land is carried at cost.
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Premises and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging
from 26 to 39 years. Furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging
from 3 to 10 years.
Foreclosed Real Estate Assets acquired through or
instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded
at fair value when acquired, establishing a new cost
basis. If fair value declines subsequent to
foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded
through expense. Operating costs after acquisition
are expensed.
Servicing Rights Servicing assets represent
the allocated value of retained servicing rights on
loans sold. Servicing assets are expensed in
proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net
servicing revenues. Impairment is evaluated based on
the fair value of the assets, using groupings of the
underlying loans as to interest rates. Fair value is
determined using prices for similar assets with
similar characteristics, when available, or based
upon discounted cash flows using market based
assumptions. Any impairment of a grouping is
reported as a valuation allowance, to the extent
that fair value is less than the capitalized amount
for a grouping.
Investment in Real Estate Limited Partnerships
Investment in real estate limited partnerships
represent the Bancorps investments in affordable
housing projects for the primary purpose of available
tax benefits. The method of accounting used for each
investment is based on ownership percentage in the
investment. One investment is accounted for using the
cost method of accounting. The excess of the carrying
amount of the investment over its estimated residual
value is amortized during the periods in which
associated tax credits are allocated to the investor.
The annual amortization of the investment is based on
the proportion of tax credits received in the current
year to total estimated tax credits to be allocated
to the Bancorp. The other investment is accounted for
using the equity method of accounting. Under the
equity method of accounting, the Bancorp records its
share of the partnerships earnings or losses in its
income statement and adjusts the carrying amount of
the investments on the balance sheet. These
investments are reviewed for impairment when events
indicate their carrying amounts may not be
recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If
impaired, the investments are reported at fair value.
The Bancorps involvement in these types of
investments is for tax planning purposes only and, as
such, the Bancorp is not involved in the management
or operation of such investments.
Long-term Assets Premises and equipment, core
deposit and other intangible assets, and other long
term assets are reviewed for impairment when events
indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable
from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the
assets are recorded at fair value.
Bank Owned Life Insurance The Bank has
purchased life insurance policies on certain key
management personnel. Bank owned life insurance is
recorded at its cash surrender value, or the amount
that can be realized.
Repurchase Agreements Substantially, all
repurchase agreement liabilities represent amounts
advanced by various customers that are not covered
by federal deposit insurance and are secured by
securities owned by the Bancorp.
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
The Bancorp sponsors a defined benefit
postretirement plan that provides comprehensive
major medical benefits to all eligible
23
retirees. Postretirement benefits are accrued
based on the expected cost of providing
postretirement benefits to employees during the
years the employees have rendered service to the
Bancorp.
Stock Compensation Effective January 1, 2006,
the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-based Payment, using the modified
prospective transition method. Accordingly, the
Company has recorded stock-based employee
compensation cost using the fair value method
starting in 2006. For 2006, adopting this standard
resulted in a reduction of income before income
taxes of $37 thousand, a reduction in net income of
$22 thousand, a decrease in basic and diluted
earnings per share of $0.01 and a decrease in cash
flow from operations of $37 thousand.
During 2006, the exercising of stock options
increased cash flows from financing activities by
$231 thousand. In addition, the tax effect from the
exercising of nonqualified stock options increased
cash flows from financing activities by $15
thousand.
As of December 31, 2006, there was $30 thousand
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested stock options granted under the Plan. The
cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
Prior to January 1, 2006, employee compensation
expense under stock options was reported using the
intrinsic value method; therefore, no stock based
compensation cost is reflected in net income for the
years ending December 31, 2005 and 2004, as all
options granted had an exercise price equal to or
greater than the market price of the underlying
common stock at date of grant.
The following table illustrates the effect on
net income and earnings per share if expense was
measured using the fair value recognition provisions
of FASB Statement No. 123,
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, for the
years ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
6,672 |
|
|
$ |
6,290 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair
value based method |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
|
$ |
6,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
as reported |
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
Pro forma basic earnings
per common share |
|
$ |
2.38 |
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share
as reported |
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
Pro forma diluted earnings
per common share |
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
Income Taxes Income tax expense is the
total of the current year income tax due or
refundable and the change in deferred tax assets
and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for
the temporary differences between carrying amounts
and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed
using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if
needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount
expected to be realized.
Loan
Commitments and Related Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include off-balance sheet
credit instruments, such as commitments to make
loans and standby letters of credit, issued to meet
customer financing needs. The face amount for these
items represents the exposure to loss, before
considering customer collateral or ability to repay.
Such financial instruments are recorded when they are
funded.
Earnings Per Common Share Basic earnings per
common share is net income divided by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per common share
includes the dilutive effect of additional potential
common shares issuable under stock options.
Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income
consists of net income and other comprehensive
income. Other comprehensive income for the Bancorp
includes unrealized gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale.
Loss Contingencies Loss contingencies,
including claims and legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of business, are recorded as
liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable
and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably
estimated. Management does not believe there now are
such matters that will have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Restrictions on Cash Cash on hand or on
deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of $345,000
and $5,398,000 was required to meet regulatory
reserve and clearing requirements at year-end 2006
and 2005. These balances do not earn interest.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair
values of financial instruments are estimated using
relevant market information and other assumptions,
as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair
value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment
regarding interest rates, credit risk,
prepayments and other factors, especially in the
absence of broad markets for particular items.
Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could
significantly affect the estimates.
Operating Segments While the Bancorps
executive management monitors the revenue streams
of the various products and services, the
identifiable segments are not material and
operations are managed and financial performance is
evaluated on a company-wide basis. Accordingly, all
of the Bancorps financial service operations are
considered by management to be aggregated in one
reportable operating segment.
Reclassification Certain amounts appearing in
the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2005, may have been reclassified to
conform to the December 31, 2006 presentation.
24
Adoption of New Accounting Standards Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R),
Share-based Payment. See Stock Compensation above
for further discussion of the effect of adopting this
standard.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). This Statement requires an
employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded
status of a defined benefit postretirement plan
(other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or
liability in its balance sheet, beginning with year
end 2006, and to recognize changes in the funded
status in the year in which the changes occur through
comprehensive income beginning in 2007. Additionally,
defined benefit plan assets and obligations are to be
measured as of the date of the employers fiscal
year-end, starting in 2008.
Adoption had the following effect on
individual line items in the 2006 balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Before |
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Application |
|
|
|
|
|
Application |
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
of SFAS |
|
|
SFAS No. 58 |
|
Adjustments |
|
No. 58 |
Liability for postretirement benefits |
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
22 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,464 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
Total assets |
|
|
619,060 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
618,982 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
569,157 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
568,972 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
49,903 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
50,010 |
|
In September 2006, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108), which is
effective for fiscal years ending on or after November
15, 2006. SAB 108 provides guidance on how the effects
of prior-year uncorrected financial statement
misstatements should be considered in quantifying a
current year misstatement. SAB 108 requires public
companies to quantify misstatements using both an
income statement (rollover) and balance sheet (iron
curtain) approach and evaluate whether either approach
results in a misstatement that, when all relevant
quantitative and qualitative factors are considered,
is material. If prior year errors that had been
previously considered immaterial now are considered
material based on either approach, no restatement is
required so long as management properly applied its
previous approach and all relevant facts and
circumstances were considered. Adjustments considered
immaterial in prior years under the method previously
used, but now considered material under the dual
approach required by SAB 108, are to be recorded upon
initial adoption of SAB 108. The amount so recorded is
shown as a cumulative effect adjustment is recorded in
opening retained earnings as of January 1, 2006. The
adoption of SAB 108 had no effect on the Companys
financial statements for the year ending December 31,
2006.
Effect of Newly Issued But Not Yet Effective
Accounting Standards In February 2006, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments-an amendment to FASB
Statements No. 133 and 140. This Statement
permits fair value re-measurement for any hybrid
financial instruments, clarifies which instruments
are subject to the requirements of Statement No.
133, and establishes a requirement to evaluate
interests in securitized financial assets and
other items. The new standard is effective for
financial assets acquired or issued after the
beginning of the entitys first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. Management does
not expect the adoption of this Statement to have
a material impact on its consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets-an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This Statement
provides the following: 1) revised guidance on when a
servicing asset and servicing liability should be
recognized; 2) requires all separately recognized
servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be
initially measured at fair value, if practicable; 3)
permits an entity to elect to measure servicing
assets and servicing liabilities at fair value each
reporting date and report changes in fair value in
earnings in the period in which the changes occur; 4)
upon initial adoption, permits a one-time
reclassification of available-for-sale securities to
trading securities for securities which are
identified as offsetting the entitys exposure to
changes in the fair value of servicing assets or
liabilities that a servicer elects to subsequently
measure at fair value; and 5) requires separate
presentation of servicing assets and servicing
liabilities subsequently measured at fair value in
the statement of financial position and additional
footnote disclosures. This standard is effective as
of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
that begins after September 15, 2006 with the effects
of initial adoption being reported as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings.
Management does not expect that the adoption of this
statement will have a material impact on its
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement
defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This Statement establishes
a fair value hierarchy about the assumptions used to
measure fair value and clarifies assumptions about
risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or
use of an asset. The standard is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company has not completed its evaluation of the
impact of the adoption of this standard.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48), which prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim
25
periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2006. The Company has determined that the
adoption of FIN 48 will not have a material effect
on the financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues
Task Force finalized Issue No. 06-4, Accounting
for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement
Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Arrangements. This issue requires that
a liability be recorded during the service period
when a split-dollar life insurance agreement
continues after participants employment or
retirement. The required accrued liability will be
based on either the post-employment benefit cost
for the continuing life insurance or based on the
future death benefit depending on the contractual
terms of the underlying agreement. This issue is
effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2007. The Company has not completed
its evaluation of the impact of adoption of EITF
06-4.
In September 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues
Task Force finalized Issue No. 06-5, Accounting for
Purchases of Life Insurance Determining the Amount
That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB
Technical Bulletin No. 85- 4 (Accounting for
Purchases of Life Insurance). This issue requires
that a policyholder consider contractual terms of a
life insurance policy in determining the amount that
could be realized under the insurance contract. It
also requires that if the contract provides for a
greater surrender value if all individual policies
in a group are surrendered at the same time, that
the surrender value be determined based on the
assumption that policies will be surrendered on an
individual basis. Lastly, the issue discusses
whether the cash surrender value should be
discounted when the policyholder is contractually
limited in its ability to surrender a policy. This
issue is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. The Company does not believe the
adoption of this issue will have a material impact
on the financial statements.
NOTE 2 Securities
The fair value of available-for-sale
securities and the related gross unrealized gains
and losses recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
39,596 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
CMO and mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
38,302 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
Municipal securities |
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
CMO government sponsored entities |
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
83,765 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
(996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored entities |
|
$ |
45,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(958 |
) |
CMO and mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
26,496 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
Municipal securities |
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
CMO government sponsored entities |
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
76,382 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(1,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount, unrecognized gains
and losses, and fair value of securities
held-to-maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities |
|
$ |
14,709 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
14,843 |
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
15,247 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
15,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities |
|
$ |
13,161 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
13,119 |
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
13,711 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
|
$ |
13,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of debt securities and
carrying amount, if different, at year end 2006 by
contractual maturity were as follows. Securities
not due at a single maturity date, primarily
mortgage-backed securities, are shown separately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
18,329 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Due from one to five years |
|
|
18,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due over five years |
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
14,709 |
|
|
|
14,843 |
|
CMO and mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
38,302 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
83,765 |
|
|
$ |
15,247 |
|
|
$ |
15,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Proceeds |
|
$ |
3,290 |
|
|
$ |
8,777 |
|
|
$ |
8,305 |
|
Gross gains |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
Gross losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Losses in 2005 were part of a portfolio
reallocation that was executed in the investment
portfolio. The transaction improved the investment
yield while enhancing portfolio diversification. The
tax benefit (provision) related to these net
realized gains and losses
were $1,000 for 2006, $27,000 for 2005 and
$110,000 for 2004.
Securities with carrying values of $20,329,000
and $21,122,000 were pledged as of December 31, 2006
and 2005 as collateral for repurchase agreements and
public funds and for other purposes as permitted or
required by law.
26
Securities with unrealized losses at year-end
2006 not recognized in income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months |
|
|
or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
sponsored entities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35,519 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
35,519 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
CMO and mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
21,594 |
|
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
22,512 |
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
Municipal securities |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
3,572 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
60,220 |
|
|
$ |
(1,014 |
) |
|
$ |
63,792 |
|
|
$ |
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with unrealized losses at
year end 2005 not recognized in income are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 months |
|
|
or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description of Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
sponsored entities |
|
$ |
15,551 |
|
|
$ |
(197 |
) |
|
$ |
30,292 |
|
|
$ |
(761 |
) |
|
$ |
45,843 |
|
|
$ |
(958 |
) |
CMO and mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
17,230 |
|
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
9,881 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
27,111 |
|
|
|
(710 |
) |
Municipal securities |
|
|
8,466 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
9,610 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired |
|
$ |
41,247 |
|
|
$ |
(664 |
) |
|
$ |
41,317 |
|
|
$ |
(1,144 |
) |
|
$ |
82,564 |
|
|
$ |
(1,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities have not
been recognized into income because the securities
are of high credit quality. Management has the intent
and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, and
the decline in fair value is largely due to changes
in interest rates. The fair value is expected to
recover as the securities approach maturity.
The Bancorp evaluates securities for
other-than-temporary impairment, at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or
market concerns
warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given
to the length of time and the extent to which the
fair value has been less than cost, the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and
the intent and ability of the Bancorp to retain its
investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
fair value. In analyzing an issuers financial
condition, the Bancorp may consider whether the
securities are issued by the federal government or
its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating
agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of
the issuers financial condition.
NOTE 3 Loans Receivable
Year end loans are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Loans secured by real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land development |
|
$ |
48,688 |
|
|
$ |
47,957 |
|
Residential, including home equity |
|
|
234,560 |
|
|
|
235,488 |
|
Commercial real estate and other dwelling |
|
|
126,966 |
|
|
|
112,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans secured by real estate |
|
|
410,214 |
|
|
|
396,130 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
4,057 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
46,918 |
|
|
|
50,215 |
|
Government and other |
|
|
12,254 |
|
|
|
19,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
472,383 |
|
|
|
469,894 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(625 |
) |
Undisbursed loan funds |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
$ |
471,716 |
|
|
$ |
469,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses
is summarized below for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
3,892 |
|
|
$ |
3,787 |
|
Provision charged to income |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Loans charged-off |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
4,267 |
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
3,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans at year end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Loans past due over 90 days still on accrual |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
998 |
|
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
Impaired loans at year end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Year end loans with no allocated
allowances for loan losses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Year end loans with allocated
allowances for loan losses |
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of the allowance for
loan losses allocated |
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
Average of impaired loans
during the year |
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
Interest income recognized
during impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-basis interest income
recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4 Loan Servicing
Mortgage loans serviced for others are
not reported as assets. The principle balances of
these loans at year end are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Mortgage loan portfolio
serviced for FHLMC |
|
$ |
40,848 |
|
|
$ |
38,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Custodial escrow balances maintained in
connection with the foregoing loan servicing were
approximately $385,000 and $636,000 at December 31,
2006 and 2005.
27
Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing
rights, and the related valuation allowance, was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Servicing rights: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
Additions |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Amortized to expense |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year |
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At year end 2006, 2005 and 2004, there
was no valuation allowance required.
NOTE 5 Premises and Equipment, Net
At year end, premises and equipment are
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
13,856 |
|
|
|
13,742 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost |
|
|
24,707 |
|
|
|
23,347 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(10,104 |
) |
|
|
(8,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
$ |
14,603 |
|
|
$ |
14,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $1,267,000;
$1,251,000 and $1,242,000 for 2006, 2005 and 2004.
NOTE 6 Income Taxes
Components of the income tax expenses
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Federal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
2,578 |
|
|
$ |
2,577 |
|
|
$ |
2,531 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
State: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expenses |
|
$ |
2,674 |
|
|
$ |
3,118 |
|
|
$ |
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rates differ from federal
statutory rate of 34% applied to income before
income taxes due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Federal statutory rate |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
Tax expense at statutory rate |
|
$ |
3,111 |
|
|
$ |
3,329 |
|
|
$ |
3,233 |
|
State tax, net of federal effect |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
Tax exempt income |
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expenses |
|
$ |
2,674 |
|
|
$ |
3,118 |
|
|
$ |
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax
asset recorded in the consolidated balance sheets
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debts |
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,630 |
|
Deferred loan fees |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Unrealized depreciation on securities
available-for-sale |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Other |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,746 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(800 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
|
|
(1,326 |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
1,503 |
|
|
$ |
1,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bancorp qualified under provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code, in prior years, to deduct
from taxable income a provision for bad debts in
excess of the provision for such losses charged to
income in the financial statements, if any.
Accordingly, retained earnings at December 31, 2006
and 2005 includes, approximately $5,982,000 for which
no provision for federal income taxes has been made.
If, in the future, this
portion of retained earnings is used for any
purpose other than to absorb bad debt losses, federal
income taxes would be imposed at the then applicable
rates. The unrecorded deferred income tax liability
on the above amounts was approximately $2,034,000 at
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
NOTE 7 Deposits
The aggregate amount of certificates of
deposit with a balance of $100 thousand or more was
$81.4 million at December 31, 2006 and $79.1 million
at December 31, 2005.
At December 31, 2006, scheduled
maturities of certificates of deposit were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
202,256 |
|
2008 |
|
|
9,645 |
|
2009 |
|
|
990 |
|
2010 |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
213,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8 Borrowed Funds
At year end, borrowed funds are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
14,717 |
|
|
$ |
12,075 |
|
Fixed rate advances from the FHLB |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
Putable advances from the FHLB |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
Line of credit from the FHLB |
|
|
3,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partnership obligation |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,501 |
|
|
$ |
51,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Repurchase agreements generally mature
within one year and are secured by U.S. government
and U.S agency securities, under the Bancorps
control. At year end, information concerning these
retail repurchase agreements is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
14,717 |
|
|
$ |
12,075 |
|
Average balance during the year |
|
|
14,242 |
|
|
|
13,938 |
|
Maximum month-end balance during the year |
|
|
21,715 |
|
|
|
14,490 |
|
Securities underlying the agreements at year end: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
20,329 |
|
|
|
21,122 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
20,329 |
|
|
|
21,122 |
|
Average interest rate during the year |
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
At year end, advances from the Federal
Home Loan Bank were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Fixed rate advances, maturing January 2007
through October 2009, at rates from
2.80% to 5.48% average rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 - 4.05%; 2005 - 3.40% |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
33,000 |
|
Putable advances, maturing July 2008,
at a rate of 5.28%, average rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 - 5.28%; 2005 - 5.17% |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
Fixed rate advances are payable at
maturity, with a prepayment penalty. Putable advances
are fixed for a period of one to three years and then
may adjust quarterly to the three-month London
Interbank Offered Rate until maturity. Once the
putable advance interest rate adjusts, the Bancorp
has the option to prepay the advance on specified
quarterly interest rate reset dates. The advances
were collateralized by mortgage loans totaling
$181,634,000 and $182,357,000 under a blanket lien
arrangement at December 31, 2006 and 2005. In
addition to the fixed rate and putable advances, the
Bancorp maintains a $10.0 million line of credit with
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis. The
outstanding balance on the line of credit was $3.1
million and $0 at December 31, 2006 and 2005. At
December 31, 2006, based on eligible collateral, the
Bancorp could borrow up to $130.4 million in FHLB
advances.
The limited partnership obligation represents an
investment interest in a partnership formed for the
construction, ownership and management of affordable
housing projects. The original amount of the note was
$500,000. Funding began during 2001 and will continue
over a nine year period. Payments are required within
ten days of written demand. The obligation to make
payment is absolute and unconditional. The note
requires no payment of interest.
Other borrowings at December 31, 2006 and
2005 include Treasury, Tax and Loan and
reclassified bank balances.
At December 31, 2006, scheduled
maturities of borrowed funds were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
41,501 |
|
2008 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9 Employees Benefit Plans
The Bancorp maintains an Employees Savings
and Profit Sharing Plan and Trust for all employees
who meet the plan qualifications. Employees are
eligible to participate in the Employees Savings and
Profit Sharing
Plan and Trust on the first day of the month
coincident with or the next date following the
completion of one year of employment, age 18, and
completion of at least 1,000 hours of employment. The
Employees Savings Plan feature allows employees to
make pre-tax contributions to the Employees Savings
Plan of 1% to 50% of Plan Salary, subject to
limitations imposed by Internal Revenue Code section
401(k). The Profit Sharing Plan and Trust feature is
noncontributory on the part of the employee.
Contributions to the Employees Profit Sharing Plan
and Trust are made at the discretion of the Bancorps
Board of Directors. Contributions for the year ended
December 31, 2006, were based on 6% of the
participants total compensation excluding
incentives.
Contributions during the years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004 were based on 8% and 11% of the
participants total compensation excluding
incentives. Participants in the plan become 100%
vested upon completion of five years of service. The
benefit plan expense amounted to $299,000, $387,000
and $514,000 for 2006, 2005 and 2004.
The Bancorp maintains an Unqualified Deferred
Compensation Plan (the Plan). The purpose of the Plan
is to provide deferred compensation to key senior
management employees of the Bancorp in order to
recognize their substantial contributions to the Bank
and provide them with additional financial security
as inducement to remain with the Bank. The
Compensation Committee selects which persons shall be
participants in the Plan. Participants accounts are
credited each year with an amount based on a formula
involving the participants employer funded
contributions under all qualified plans and the
limitations imposed by Internal Revenue Code
subsection 401(a)(17) and Code section 415. The
unqualified deferred compensation plan liability at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $75,000 and $65,000.
The Plan expense amounted to $6,000, $7,000 and
$8,000 for 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Directors have deferred some of their fees in
consideration of future payments. Fee deferrals,
including interest totaled $129,000, $103,000 and
$63,000 for 2006, 2005 and 2004. The deferred fee
liability at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was
$1,269,000 and $1,140,000.
During 2006 and 2004, the Bank purchased $2.0
million and $8.0 million in bank owned life
insurance. The business purpose of the bank owned
life insurance is to offset the cost of Bancorp
sponsored employee benefits. The bank owned life
insurance is recorded as an asset on the Bancorps
balance sheet. Increases in cash value of the
policies are recorded as noninterest income.
NOTE 10 Defined Benefit Postretirement Plan
The Bancorp sponsors a defined benefit
postretirement plan that provides comprehensive
major medical benefits to all eligible retirees.
Eligible retirees are those who have attained age
65, have completed at least 18 years of service and
are eligible for coverage under the employee group
29
medical plan as of the date of their
retirement. Spouses of eligible retirees are
covered if they were covered as of the employees
date of retirement. Surviving spouses are covered
if they were covered at the time of the retirees
death. Dependent children of eligible retirees
are generally covered to the later of age 19 or
until the child ceases being a full-time student.
Surviving dependent children are subject to the
same eligibility restrictions if they were
covered at the time of the retirees death.
Currently, the Bancorp pays $143.00 of the
retiree monthly medical coverage premium. This
amount will remain fixed over the benefit period.
Retirees pay 100% of the premiums for all
dependent medical coverage. The unrecognized net
actuarial gain of $0 and $142,000 at December 31,
2006 and 2005, is a result of a decrease in the
plan participation assumptions.
The following table sets forth a
reconciliation of the Bancorps postretirement
benefit plan funding status and expense for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning benefit obligation |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
Unrecognized net actuarial
(gain)/loss |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending benefit obligation |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial
(gain)/loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to adoption of FAS Statement
158, $221 thousand was recognized in the balance
sheet at December 31, 2005.
Net gains of $107 thousand were recognized
in accumulated other comprehensive income at
December 31, 2006. The accumulated benefit
obligation was $22 thousand and $79 thousand at
year end 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic
postretirement benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for prior year
expected net benefit cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
Service cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Unrecognized net actuarial
(gain)/loss |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement
benefit cost |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated unrecognized gain for the
postretirement benefit plan that will be amortized
from accumulated other comprehensive income into
net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal
year is $18,305.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Annual health care trend rates
at year-end: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health care cost trend
rate assumed |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
Rate that the cost rate
declines to |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Year that the rate reaches
the rate it is assumed
to remain at |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates
have a significant effect on the amounts
reported for the health care plans. A
one-percentage-point change in assumed health
care cost trend rates would have the following
effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
One Percentage Point |
|
|
One Percentage Point |
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Decrease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on total of service and
interest cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Effect on postretirement
benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bancorp expects to contribute
$6,000 to its defined benefit postretirement plan
in 2007.
The following benefit payments, which
reflect expected future service, are expected:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
201 |
|
2008 |
|
|
198 |
|
2009 |
|
|
194 |
|
2010 |
|
|
553 |
|
2011 |
|
|
772 |
|
Following 5 years |
|
|
7,031 |
|
NOTE 11 Regulatory Capital
The Bancorp and Bank are subject to
regulatory capital requirements administered by
federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy
guidelines and prompt corrective action
regulations involve quantitative measures of
assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet
items calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. Capital amounts and classifications are
also subject to qualitative judgments by
regulators. Failure to meet various capital
requirements can initiate regulatory action.
Prompt corrective action regulations provide five
classifications, including well capitalized,
adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized, and critically
undercapitalized, although these terms are not
used to represent overall financial condition. If
adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is
required to accept brokered deposits. If
undercapitalized capital distributions are
limited, as is asset growth and expansion, capital
restoration plans are required.
At year end 2006 and 2005, the most recent regulatory notifications
categorized the Bancorp and Bank as well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action. There are no conditions
or events since that notification that management
believes have changed the Bancorps or the Banks
category.
30
At year end, capital levels (in millions)
for the Bancorp and the Bank were substantially
the same. Actual capital levels, minimum
required levels and levels needed to be
classified as well capitalized for the Bancorp
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required To Be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Required |
|
|
Under Prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Capital |
|
|
Corrective |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
Action Regulations |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
54.7 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
$ |
36.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
50.4 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to
adjusted average assets |
|
$ |
50.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
51.7 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
47.5 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
$ |
17.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to
adjusted average assets |
|
$ |
47.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
$ |
30.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
The Bancorps ability to pay dividends
is entirely dependent upon the Banks ability to
pay dividends to the Bancorp. Under Indiana law,
the Bank may pay dividends of so much of its
undivided profits (generally, earnings less
losses, bad debts, taxes and other operating
expenses) as is considered expedient by the
Banks Board of Directors. However, the Bank must
obtain the approval of the Indiana Department of
Financial Institutions for the payment of a
dividend if the total of all dividends declared
by the Bank during the current year, including
the proposed dividend, would exceed the sum of
retained net income for the year-to-date plus its
retained net income for the previous two years.
For this purpose, retained net income means net
income as calculated for call report purposes,
less all dividends declared for the applicable
period. Moreover, the FDIC and the Federal
Reserve Board may prohibit the payment of
dividends if it determines that the payment of
dividends would constitute an unsafe or unsound
practice because of the financial condition of
the Bank. The aggregate amount of dividends which
may be declared by the Bank in 2007, without
prior regulatory approval, approximates
$4,907,000 plus current 2007 net profits.
NOTE 12 Stock Based Compensation
The Bancorps 2004 Stock Option Plan
(the Plan), which is shareholder-approved,
permits the grant of share options to its
employees for up to 250,000 shares of common
stock. Awards granted under the Plan may be in
the form of incentive stock options,
non-incentive stock options, or restricted stock. The purposes
of the Plan are to attract and retain the best
available personnel, to provide additional
incentives for all employees and to encourage
their continued employment by facilitating employees
purchases of an equity interest in the Bancorp.
Option awards are generally granted with an
exercise price equal to the market price of the
Bancorps common stock at the date of grant;
those option awards have 5 year vesting periods
and have 10-year contractual terms. Total
compensation cost that has been charged against
income for those plans was $37 thousand, $0, and
$0 for 2006, 2005 and 2004. The total income tax
benefit was $15 thousand for 2006 and $0 for 2005
and 2004.
The fair value of each option award is
estimated on the date of grant using a closed
form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model that
uses the assumptions noted in the table below.
Expected volatilities are based on historical
volatilities of the Companys common stock. The
Company uses historical data to estimate option
exercise and post-vesting termination behavior.
(Employee and management options are tracked
separately.) The expected term of options granted
is based on historical data and represents the
period of time that options granted are expected
to be outstanding, which takes into account that
the options are not transferable. The risk-free
interest rate for the expected term of the option
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of the grant.
The fair value of options granted was
determined using the following weighted average
assumptions as of grant date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
Expected term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-7 years |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.50 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
A summary of the Bancorps stock
option activity for 2006 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at
beginning of year |
|
|
97,385 |
|
|
$ |
22.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(11,348 |
) |
|
|
20.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
end of year |
|
|
86,037 |
|
|
$ |
22.92 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at
end of year |
|
|
40,412 |
|
|
$ |
20.32 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information related to the stock
option plan during each year follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of
options exercised |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
Cash received from
options exercised |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Tax benefit realized from
options exercised |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value
of options granted |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
31
As of December 31, 2006, there was
$30,469 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested stock options granted under
the Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
Restricted stock awards are generally
granted with an award price equal to the
market price of the Bancorps common stock on
the award date. Restricted stock awards have
been issued with a five year cliff vesting
period. Forfeiture provisions exist for
personnel that separate employment before the
vesting period expires. Compensation expense
related to restricted stock awards are
recognized over the employees service period.
A summary of changes in the Bancorps
nonvested restricted stock for 2006 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Nonvested Shares |
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
7,400 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, there was
$140,558 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested shares granted under the
Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.9 years. No shares
vested during the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004.
NOTE 13 Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic earnings per common
share and diluted earnings per common share
computations for 2006, 2005 and 2004 is presented
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
6,475,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,672,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,290,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
2,791,933 |
|
|
|
2,781,735 |
|
|
|
2,764,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings
per common share |
|
$ |
2.32 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
6,475,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,672,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,290,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
2,791,933 |
|
|
|
2,781,735 |
|
|
|
2,764,657 |
|
Add: dilutive effect of assumed
stock option exercises |
|
|
21,017 |
|
|
|
32,779 |
|
|
|
44,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common and
dilutive potential common shares
outstanding |
|
|
2,812,950 |
|
|
|
2,814,514 |
|
|
|
2,808,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
per common share |
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
2.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 11,450 antidilutive shares
outstanding at December 31, 2006, and no
antidilutive shares outstanding for 2005 and
2004.
NOTE 14 Related Party Transactions
The Bancorp had aggregate loans
outstanding to directors and executive officers
(with individual balances exceeding $60,000) of
$5,666,000 at December 31, 2006 and $6,900,000
at December 31, 2005. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, the following activity
occurred on these loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Aggregate balance January 1, 2006 |
|
$ |
6,900 |
|
New loans |
|
|
716 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Aggregate balance December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
5,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits from directors and executive
officers were $2.7 million and $2.5 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
NOTE 15 Commitments and Contingencies
The Bancorp is a party to financial
instruments in the normal course of business to
meet financing needs of its customers. These
financial instruments, which include commitments
to make loans and standby letters of credit, are
not reflected in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements. Such financial instruments
are recorded when they are funded.
The Bancorps exposure to credit loss in the
event of non-performance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to originate
loans and standby letters of credit is represented
by the contractual amount of those instruments.
Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require the
payment of a fee. The Bancorp uses the same credit
policy to make such commitments as it uses for
on-balance sheet items. Since commitments to make
loans may expire without being used, the amount does
not necessarily represent future cash commitments.
The Bancorp had outstanding
commitments to originate loans as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38,666 |
|
|
$ |
38,666 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
12,963 |
|
|
|
37,746 |
|
|
|
50,709 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Unsecured consumer overdrafts |
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,837 |
|
|
$ |
76,453 |
|
|
$ |
95,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,418 |
|
|
$ |
33,418 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
11,252 |
|
|
|
33,096 |
|
|
|
44,348 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Unsecured consumer overdrafts |
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,492 |
|
|
$ |
66,593 |
|
|
$ |
84,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $12,963 in fixed rate commitments
outstanding at December 31, 2006 had interest
rates ranging from 4.75% to 9.125%, for a period
not to exceed forty-five days. At December 31,
2005, fixed rate commitments outstanding of
$11,252 had interest rates ranging from 4.25% to
8.625%, for a period not to exceed forty-five
days.
32
Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by the Bancorp to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Bancorp had
standby letters of credit totaling $4,026,000 and
$4,049,000. The Bancorp evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The
amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
by the Bancorp upon extension of credit, is based
on managements credit evaluation of the borrower.
Collateral obtained may include accounts
receivable, inventory, property, land or other
assets.
NOTE 16 Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The following table shows fair values
and the related carrying values of financial
instruments as of the dates indicated. Items
that are not financial instruments are not
included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
15,764 |
|
|
$ |
15,764 |
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
83,765 |
|
|
|
83,765 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
15,247 |
|
|
|
15,380 |
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
467,449 |
|
|
|
464,706 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand and savings deposits |
|
|
299,599 |
|
|
|
299,599 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
213,332 |
|
|
|
212,621 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
51,501 |
|
|
|
50,676 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
39,831 |
|
|
$ |
39,831 |
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
76,382 |
|
|
|
76,382 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity |
|
|
13,711 |
|
|
|
13,668 |
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
464,862 |
|
|
|
460,005 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
2,987 |
|
|
|
2,987 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand and savings deposits |
|
|
311,128 |
|
|
|
311,128 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
214,603 |
|
|
|
213,347 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
51,153 |
|
|
|
49,893 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
For purposes of the above disclosures
of estimated fair value, the following
assumptions were used as of December 31, 2006 and
2005. The estimated fair value for cash and cash
equivalents, Federal Home Loan Bank stock and
investments in real estate limited partnerships
are considered to approximate cost. The estimated
fair value for securities is based on
quoted market values for the individual
securities or equivalent securities. The
estimated fair value for loans is based on
estimates of the rate the Bancorp would charge
for similar such loans at December 31, 2006 and
2005, applied for the time period until estimated
repayment. The estimated fair value for demand
and savings deposits is based on their carrying
value. The estimated fair value for certificates
of deposits is based on estimates of the rate the
Bancorp would pay on such deposits at December
31, 2006 and 2005, applied for the time period
until maturity. The estimated fair value for
borrowed funds is based on current rates for
similar financings. The estimated fair value of
other financial instruments, and off-balance
sheet loan commitments approximate cost and are
not considered significant to this presentation.
NOTE 17 Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
Other comprehensive income/(loss)
components and related taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net change in net unrealized gains and
losses on securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) arising
during the year |
|
$ |
919 |
|
|
$ |
(1,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(832 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for gains
included in net income |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in net unrealized
gains and losses on securities
available for sale |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
(1,407 |
) |
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
Tax effects, net |
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive
income/(loss) |
|
$ |
593 |
|
|
$ |
(909 |
) |
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 18 Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Selected quarterly financial
data is summarized as follows:
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
8,305 |
|
|
$ |
8,624 |
|
|
$ |
8,907 |
|
|
$ |
9,143 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
5,039 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
3,620 |
|
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before
income taxes |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
2,095 |
|
Income tax expenses |
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,676 |
|
|
$ |
1,653 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
|
$ |
1,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
7,007 |
|
|
$ |
7,411 |
|
|
$ |
7,557 |
|
|
$ |
8,049 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
5,058 |
|
|
|
5,141 |
|
|
|
5,006 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
4,993 |
|
|
|
5,081 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
|
|
4,981 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
951 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
3,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before
income taxes |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
2,423 |
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
Income tax expenses |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,607 |
|
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per sharee |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 19 Parent Company Only Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
NorthWest Indiana Bancorp |
|
|
|
Condensed Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on deposit with Peoples Bank |
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
Investment in Peoples Bank |
|
|
48,655 |
|
|
|
45,265 |
|
Dividends receivable from Peoples Bank |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
51,664 |
|
|
$ |
47,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable |
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
919 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
4,299 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
46,952 |
|
|
|
44,388 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
50,010 |
|
|
|
46,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
51,664 |
|
|
$ |
47,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
NorthWest Indiana Bancorp |
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Income |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from
Peoples Bank |
|
$ |
3,907 |
|
|
$ |
4,568 |
|
|
$ |
3,425 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and equity in undistributed
income of Peoples Bank |
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
Provision (benefit)
for income taxes |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity
in undistributed
income of Peoples Bank |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
Equity in undistributed
income of Peoples Bank |
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
|
$ |
6,672 |
|
|
$ |
6,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
NorthWest Indiana Bancorp |
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows
from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,475 |
|
|
$ |
6,672 |
|
|
$ |
6,290 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash from
operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed
net income of
Peoples Bank |
|
|
(2,690 |
) |
|
|
(2,218 |
) |
|
|
(2,957 |
) |
Stock-based
compensation expense |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in other assets |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
Change in other liabilities |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(1,892 |
) |
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from
operating activities |
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(3,850 |
) |
|
|
(3,617 |
) |
|
|
(3,398 |
) |
Treasury stock purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance
of common stock |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from
financing activities |
|
|
(3,604 |
) |
|
|
(3,368 |
) |
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
Cash at beginning of year |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year |
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Market Information
The Bancorps Common Stock is traded
in the over-the-counter market and quoted on the
OTC Bulletin Board. The Bancorps stock is not
actively traded. As of February 23, 2007, the
Bancorp had 2,801,265 shares of common stock
outstanding and 409 stockholders of record. This
does not reflect the number of persons or
entities who may hold their stock in nominee or
street name through brokerage firms. Set forth
below are the high and low bid prices during each
quarter for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005. The bid prices reflect
inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up,
mark-down or commission and may not necessarily
represent actual transactions. Also set forth is
information concerning the dividends declared by
the Bancorp during the periods reported. Note 11
to the Financial Statements describes regulatory
limits on the Bancorps ability to pay dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
Per Share Prices |
|
Declared Per |
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Common Share |
Year Ended
December 31, 2006 |
|
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
32.00 |
|
|
$ |
31.30 |
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
32.00 |
|
|
|
31.05 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
32.75 |
|
|
|
31.00 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
32.50 |
|
|
|
31.50 |
|
|
|
.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2005 |
|
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
37.05 |
|
|
$ |
33.60 |
|
|
$ |
.33 |
|
|
|
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
35.55 |
|
|
|
33.00 |
|
|
|
.33 |
|
|
|
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
34.00 |
|
|
|
32.05 |
|
|
|
.33 |
|
|
|
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
33.00 |
|
|
|
29.10 |
|
|
|
.33 |
|
|
Book Value per Share
Basic Earnings per Share
Dividends per Share
Total Return Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ending December 31, |
|
|
Index |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
NorthWest Indiana Bancorp |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
120.46 |
|
|
|
159.61 |
|
|
|
194.92 |
|
|
|
176.11 |
|
|
|
183.98 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
79.52 |
|
|
|
117.09 |
|
|
|
138.55 |
|
|
|
144.86 |
|
|
|
171.47 |
|
SNL $500M-$1B Bank Index |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
|
127.67 |
|
|
|
184.09 |
|
|
|
208.62 |
|
|
|
217.57 |
|
|
|
247.44 |
|
The performance graph and table above
compare the cumulative total shareholder return
for the Company with the cumulative total return
for the Russell 2000 Index and for the SNL
Securities index of bank stocks having $500
million to $1 billion in assets (SNL $500M-$1B
Bank Index).
35
Corporate Information
Officers
of NorthWest Indiana Bancorp and Peoples Bank
David A. Bochnowski
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Joel Gorelick
President and Chief Administrative Officer
Jon E. DeGuilio
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Robert T. Lowry
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Officers of Peoples Bank
Tanya A. Buerger
Senior Vice President,
Operations & Technology Group
Stacy A. Januszewski
Senior Vice President,
Risk Management Group
Terrence M. Quinn
Senior Vice President,
Wealth Management Group
Todd M. Scheub
Senior Vice President, Lending Group
Management Personnel of Peoples Bank
Lending Group
Commercial Lending
Ronald P. Knestrict
Vice President,
Commercial Loan Officer
Daniel W. Moser
Vice President,
Construction & Development Lending
Brian E. Rusin
Vice President, Commercial Loan Officer
Daniel J. Duncan
Commercial Loan Officer
Retail Lending
Catherine L. Gonzalez
Vice President, Manager, Retail Lending
Leslie J. Bernacki
Assistant Vice President,
Residential Loan Officer
Jeremy A. Gorelick
Assistant Vice President,
Residential Loan Officer
Rachel C. Lentz
Assistant Vice President,
Retail Lending Officer
Austin P. Logue
Assistant Vice President,
Residential Loan Officer
Alicia Q. McMahon
Assistant Vice President,
Residential Loan Officer
Nancy L. Weckler
Assistant Vice President,
Loan Underwriting
Loan Collections
Thomas Guiden
Manager, Collections
Retail Banking Group
Carla J. Houck
Vice President, Retail Banking Group
Shannon E. Franko
Vice President, Banking Center Coordinator
Cynthia S. Miles
Assistant Vice President,
Retail Banking Assistant
Banking Centers
Donna M. Vurva
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Dyer Banking Center
Margaret M. Haas
Manager, East Chicago Banking Center
Sandra L. Sigler
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Hammond Banking Center
Marilyn K. Repp
Vice President,
Senior Manager, Hobart Banking Center
Colleen A. Mastalski
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Merrillville-Broadway
Banking Center
Charman F. Williamson
Vice President,
Manager, Merrillville-Taft Banking Center
Lesli R. Heinrikson
Manager, Munster Banking Center
Kelly A. Stoming
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Schererville Banking Center
Jennifer L. Gunning
Assistant Manager,
Schererville Banking Center
Wealth Management Group
Stephan A. Ziemba
Vice President,
Senior Wealth Management Officer
Mary T. Ciciora
Vice President, Wealth Management Officer
Randall H. Walker
Vice President,
Wealth Management Officer
Igor Marjanovic
Assistant Vice President,
Wealth Management Officer
Joyce M. Barr
Assistant Vice President,
Wealth Management Officer
Operations & Technology Group
Bank Operations
Mary D. Mulroe
Vice President, Manager, Bank Operations
Deposit Operations
Meredith L. Bielak
Vice President,
Manager, Deposit Operations
Charlotte V. Conn
Assistant Vice President, Deposit Operations
Information Technology
Donna M. Gin
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Information Technology
Matthew S. Manoski
Assistant Vice President,
Information Technology
Loan Operations
Karen M. Sulek
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Loan Operations
Sharon V. Vacendak
Assistant Vice President, Loan Operations
Systems Delivery
Cynthia D. Jones
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Systems Delivery
Brand
Learning & Communications Group
Linda L. Kollada
Vice President, Human Resources
Jill M. Knight
Vice President, Training Coordinator
Michelle L. Dvorscak
Assistant Vice President,
Manager, Human Resources
Heather A. Mutka
Assistant Vice President, Marketing
Finance & Controls Group
Peymon S. Torabi
Assistant Vice President, Controller
Michaelene M. Smith
Assistant Vice President, Accounting
Risk
Management & Stakeholders Services Group
Christine M. Friel
Vice President, Loan Review
David W. Homrich
Vice President, Compliance
Linda C. Nemeth
Assistant Vice President, Internal Audit
Nicole M. Gullette
Assistant Vice President,
Assistant to the Internal Auditor
Michael J. Shimala,
Assistant Vice President, Security Officer
Other Management Personnel
Laura J. Spicer
Administrative Assistant to the Chairman
Jane G. Bridgman
Management Development
Candice N. Kouros
Management Development
Melissa L. Webb
Management Development
www.ibankpeoples.com