Corporate Profile
Corporate Overview
Corporate Profile
Officers & Directors
Committee Charting
Stock Information
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Stock Quote
Historic Prices
Dividends
Financial Calculators
News & Events
Press Releases
Event Calendar
SEC Filings
Documents
Annual Reports
Insider Filings
Insider Ownership
Institutional Ownership
Form 8937 - First Personal Acquisition
Form 8937 - AJS Bancorp Acquisition
Financial Information
Financial Highlights
Balance Sheet
Income Statement
Deposit Loan Composition
Deposit Marketshare
As Reported Financials
Other Information
Information Request
Email Notification
FAQs
IR Site Map
Adjust Contrast
( Press C )
Sitemap
( Press S )
Accessibility Statement
( Press A )
Close Toolbar
( Press Escape )
Need help?
(219) 836-4400 »
Contact Us »
Accessibility
Options
Menu
Personal
Business
Mortgage Center
Wealth Management
Tools and Resources
About Us
Locations
Close Mobile Search Drop Down
Search for products, rates or information.
Search
About Peoples
Locations
Contact Us
Investor Relations
Personal
Business
Mortgage Center
Wealth Management
Tools & Resources
Institutional Ownership
IR MENU
Ownership > 100%
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.