Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Note 12 - Upcoming Accounting Standards

v3.19.3
Note 12 - Upcoming Accounting Standards
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2019
Notes to Financial Statements  
Description of New Accounting Pronouncements Not yet Adopted [Text Block]
Note
12
- Upcoming Accounting Standards
 
In
June 2016,
FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
. The ASU includes increased disclosures and various changes to the accounting and measurement of financial assets including the Bancorp’s loans and available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities. Each financial asset presented on the balance sheet would have a unique allowance for credit losses valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The amendments in this ASU also eliminate the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and instead, reflect an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses using reasonable and supportable forecasts. In
October 2019,
the FASB voted and approved proposed changes to the effective date of this ASU for smaller reporting companies, such as the Bancorp, and other non-SEC reporting entities. The approval changed the effective date of the ASU to fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2022,
including interim periods within those fiscal periods. The new credit loss guidance will be effective for the Bancorp's year ending
December 31, 2023.
Upon adoption, the ASU will be applied using a modified retrospective transition method to the beginning of the
first
reporting period in which the guidance is effective. A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. Early adoption for all institutions is permitted for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2018,
including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is in the process of evaluating the impact adoption of this update will have on the Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements. This process of evaluation has engaged multiple areas of the Bancorp’s management in discussing loss estimation methods and the application of these methods to specific segments of the loans receivable portfolio. Management has been actively monitoring developments and evaluating the use of different methods allowed. Due to continuing development of understanding of application, additional time is required to understand how this ASU will affect the Bancorp’s financial statements. Management plans on running parallel calculations during the year and finalizing a method or methods of adoption in time for the effective date.
 
In
January 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
2017
-
04,
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic
350
): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. This Standard simplifies the manner in which an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step
2
from the goodwill impairment test. Step
2
measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step
2,
an entity, prior to the amendments in ASU
No.
2017
-
04,
had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities, including unrecognized assets and liabilities, in accordance with the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. However, under the amendments in this ASU, an entity should
(
1
) perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and (
2
) recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the understanding that the loss recognized should
not
exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, ASU
No.
2017
-
04
removes the requirements for any reporting unit with a
zero
or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails such qualitative test, to perform Step
2
of the goodwill impairment test. Finally, this ASU amends the Overview and Background sections of the Accounting Standards Codification as part of the FASB’s initiative to unify and improve such sections across Topics and Subtopics. The new guidance will be effective for the Company’s year ending
December 31, 2020.
 
In
March 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
2017
-
08,
Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic
310
-
20
): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities
. This Standard amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. In particular, the amendments in this ASU require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do
not,
however, require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; instead, the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The amendments in this ASU more closely align the amortization period of premiums and discounts to expectations incorporated in market pricing on the underlying securities. In fact, in most cases, market participants price securities to the call date that produces the worst yield when the coupon is above current market rates (i.e., the security is trading at a premium), and price securities to maturity when the coupon is below market rates (i.e., the security is trading at a discount), in anticipation that the borrower will act in its economic best interest. The new guidance will be effective for the Company’s year ending
December 31, 2020.
Management will recognize amortization expense as dictated by the amount of premiums and the differences between maturity and call dates at the time of adoption.